March Delivery of Tejas Mk1A Fighters Now Unlikely Amid Fresh Integration Challenges and Unfinished Trials

March Delivery of Tejas Mk1A Fighters Now Unlikely Amid Fresh Integration Challenges and Unfinished Trials


The anticipated arrival of the Tejas Mk1A fighter jets for the Indian Air Force appears to be facing yet another setback, with emerging reports suggesting that the revised delivery target for March may effectively be missed.

Defence journalist Snehesh Alex Phillips, reporting for The Print, has indicated that the programme is grappling with continued delays, making a March handover highly improbable.

This potential slippage adds to a growing list of missed timelines that have plagued the induction of the indigenous fighter, which was originally slated to bolster the Air Force's combat capabilities much earlier.

Initial commitments from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) regarding the delivery schedule have seen significant downward revisions.

The manufacturer had originally promised to deliver 10 aircraft in the first phase, a figure that was subsequently reduced to five. Current assessments suggest that even this lowered quantity is now uncertain.

Although there has been no independent verification of these specific claims, the lack of any visible induction ceremony or a comprehensive status update from HAL has only deepened concerns regarding the programme's adherence to its schedule.

Officially, HAL has not declared a new delay, yet the trajectory of the programme over the last year reveals a pattern of unfulfilled promises.

The first Tejas Mk1A was originally expected to be delivered in October, but that deadline passed without result. A subsequent assurance that the aircraft would be inducted by the end of 2025 also failed to materialise.

Internal projections now suggest that March 2026 is viewed as the earliest possible window for induction, representing a lag of several months compared to the timelines previously shared with the public.

A primary technical hurdle contributing to this bottleneck is the complex process of weapons integration and certification.

While reports indicate that air-to-air weapons integration was successfully concluded in the final month of the previous year, the critical air-to-ground weapons trials remain unfinished.

These trials are a mandatory requirement for achieving Full Operational Clearance (FOC) for the Mk1A configuration. Until these specific capabilities are validated, the aircraft cannot be formally handed over to the Indian Air Force for combat duties.

These persistent delays underscore the intricate nature of upgrading the legacy Tejas platform to the advanced Mk1A standard.

This variant features significant enhancements, including an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, a modern electronic warfare (EW) suite, and compatibility with a broader array of weaponry.

Integrating these sophisticated systems requires rigorous flight testing; consequently, any technical snag encountered during this phase inevitably compresses the timeline, leaving little margin for error.

For the Indian Air Force, these delays are not merely administrative but carry serious operational implications.

The Tejas Mk1A is strategically critical for replacing the ageing fleet of MiG-21 interceptors and arresting the decline in squadron numbers, which are currently below authorised levels.

Every month of delay forces the Air Force to extend the service life of older platforms, thereby increasing the operational burden on frontline squadrons that are already stretched thin by high security demands.

Despite HAL's public maintenance that deliveries are proceeding according to plan, the sequence of missed milestones has created a noticeable credibility gap.

Open-source data indicates that the programme has also faced headwinds from supply chain issues, specifically regarding the delivery of GE F404 engines, which power the jets.

Unless the remaining weapon trials are expedited and concluded without further technical glitches, the March target is likely to become another historical footnote of a deadline that passed without the induction of India’s flagship light fighter.

Currently, the Tejas Mk1A programme remains robust in terms of its long-term technological promise, but confidence in its short-term delivery schedule continues to wane.

The upcoming weeks are poised to be decisive in establishing whether the Indian Air Force will finally receive the upgraded fighter in March or if it must endure a longer wait for the aircraft destined to form the backbone of its future defensive capabilities.
 
A company which couldn't deliver one jet in an year after receiving its engine , wants international orders. Who will believe them? There is no accountability and no competition for them. So they are enjoying doing nothing.
 
When you are unable to produce even one single jet let alone fly for field tests, you don't deserve to be on the list. HAL has become one shitty thing out there. When a country is unable to add even 50 jets in a decade, the administration, judiciary, HOEs are accountable to the nation. These babus are accountable for every loss the country faces in any form.
 
Friends. HAL is being tolerated by defence Minister who says nothing. Zero reaction. Truth should come out about the work ethic and laziness of HAL. And they want export orders? For what why? First supply IAF
 
This doesn't work like this, every country in the world take non FOC version of new Fighter planes. This is how complex system development works.....I think indian media need some training.....we are all fools here?
 
Print is known for its anti india rhetoric. Moreover, this news has no references. I doubt this as hogwash.
 
The following queries need to be answered by HAL before handing over the first Tejas Mk1A.
1. Has the Lightning Test been conveyed on any one complete aircraft.
2. Has the engine R/I time been checked and is it within 45 minutes.
3. Has full 50 psi pressure refuelling been achieved during TRS on a 3 drop tank configuration.
4. How many landings are the tyres been cleared for? Minimum 70 landings?
5. What is the DFCC R/I time and can it be done in 10 minutes? Does it require a GSE?
6. Do the batteries R/I require a GSE?
7. What is the time taken to transfer an engine from AN 32 to the mk 1A on a detachment?
8. What is the Op TRS time for sameand changed configuration including gun loading?
9. Is the CEP less than 50 m for A2G weapons?
10. What is the design MTBF, MTTR and MMH/FH FOR Mk1A?
 
Really sad and unfortunate. Personal accountability of all concerned ought to be fixed for such a fiasco. Who will bear the brunt of such an inordinate delay should yet another military encounter take place either with Pakistan or China or both of them.
 
Don't blame HAL. 90% reason of the delay is US supply of engines. They tapped the supply of engines. Without engine how we make Tejas?
 
HAL has bunch of jokers. Until defence ministry gives them warning they are enjoying. ISRO has destroyed PSLV which has track record of no failure for last many years. HAL has destroyed Tejas.
 
Don't blame HAL. 90% reason of the delay is US supply of engines. They tapped the supply of engines. Without engine how we make Tejas?
It is not so Sir. US is only a readon for HAL to cover itsshort deliveries. Use all the F 404 engines lying on AOG aircraft in Sulur to power Mk 1A. Atleast 5Mk A could have been delivered one yeR back. Why wS it not done? LCA IOC aircraft first 15 have to be brought to FOC standard. This is also not done. Lightning test on aircraft is not done. Many issues are there Sir. Not just engines

Hi Krishna. Good evening. I made a questionnaire for LCA Mk1A and sent it to Air HQ for consideration before accepting Mk1A. Some of these could fall in your envelope. Kindly see

Krishna Iyengar
2 hours ago
The following queries need to be answered by HAL before handing over the first Tejas Mk1A.
1. Has the Lightning Test been conveyed on any one complete aircraft.
2. Has the engine R/I time been checked and is it within 45 minutes.
3. Has full 50 psi pressure refuelling been achieved during TRS on a 3 drop tank configuration.
4. How many landings are the tyres been cleared for? Minimum 70 landings?
5. What is the DFCC R/I time and can it be done in 10 minutes? Does it require a GSE?
6. Do the batteries R/I require a GSE?
7. What is the time taken to transfer an engine from AN 32 to the mk 1A on a detachment?
8. What is the Op TRS time for sameand changed configuration including gun loading?
9. Is the CEP less than 50 m for A2G weapons?
10. What is the design MTBF, MTTR and MMH/FH FOR Mk1A?
 
Instead of being rapped for its endless delays in delivery, the Indian government appears bent upon rewarding HAL with big fresh orders. In the meantime castles are being built in thin air: MK1A, MK2 and even AMCA, to keep funding and high paying sarkari jobs with no accountability, alive.
 
The IAF is the sole culprit for these delays. These people are not of decent type. Had they any smack of honesty with them, they would have come forward with open declaration on Media that HAL is not at all responsible for this delay. Alas, as usual they pretend to be innocent!
I don't know why the MOD is such a docile setup that acts like a former PM(you know whom). If they had acted sane they would've insisted on IAF accepting the earlier MK1a format for now while upgrades can go on parallelly. Ie, with the agreed Israeli weapon package. Then, the IAF would've received the 5 aircrats that are gathering dust in HAL shed. Instead, they allowed the IAF quirks to replay the nasty game shifting the goal post.
I'm also amazed to note why nobody's curious here about IAF's mischievous silence on this 'delay'.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
6,216
Messages
62,349
Members
4,882
Latest member
विवेक
Back
Top