In the bidding for a fighter jet contract with the Philippines, the Saab Gripen-E is competing face-to-face with India's Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A. The Tejas is a more affordable option, but the Gripen-E has better performance capabilities, making it a more complicated decision for the Philippines.
Compared to the Gripen-E, which costs $85 million, the Tejas Mk1A is a more affordable option, with a flyaway cost of about $43 million per unit. Given Philippine budgetary constraints, the Tejas is an appealing option due of its notable price differential.
On performance, however, the Gripen-E surpasses the Tejas. It has greater battle range, heavier weapons payload, and maybe more sophisticated sensors and avionics. Depending on the Philippines' unique operating needs and perceptions of threats, these variables may be vital.
There's probably more to the Philippines' choice than just the purchase price. The ultimate decision will also be heavily influenced by additional elements like life-cycle costs, chances for technology transfer, and future upgrade possibility.
India is actively pushing the Tejas Mk1A for export in an effort to become recognised as a trustworthy provider of domestic defence platforms. Getting a contract with the Philippines would be a big step forward for this effort.
The competition's result is still up in the air because both competitors have unique benefits and drawbacks. Before making a final decision, the Philippines will need to carefully consider its priorities and compare the Tejas' cost-effectiveness to the Gripen-E's improved performance.