After ATAGS, Kalyani Group's Bharat-52 Emerges as Potential Frontrunner in Indian Army's 400 Towed Gun (TGS) Tender worth ₹6,500 Cr

After ATAGS, Kalyani Group's Bharat-52 Emerges as Potential Frontrunner in Indian Army's 400 Towed Gun (TGS) Tender worth ₹6,500 Cr


The Indian Army is moving forward with a significant procurement process for 400 new 155mm/52 caliber Towed Gun Systems (TGS), valued at approximately ₹6,500 crore. This tender is part of a larger plan to eventually acquire nearly 1,500 such units under the Army's Field Artillery Rationalisation Plan (FARP).

Amidst intense competition from major Indian defence manufacturers, Kalyani Strategic Systems Limited (KSSL), part of the Kalyani Group, is reportedly gaining an edge with its Bharat-52 artillery gun.

Sources within the defence industry indicate that KSSL's established manufacturing capabilities and potential ability to offer the Bharat-52 at a considerably lower price point could make it the leading contender.

This perceived advantage positions KSSL potentially ahead of competitors including Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) and Larsen & Toubro (L&T). The Bharat-52's cost is speculated to be nearly half that of the recently ordered Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System (ATAGS).

Developed by Bharat Forge, another Kalyani Group company, over ten years ago, the Bharat-52 is a 155mm/52 caliber towed howitzer. It boasts a range of 42 kilometers and weighs less than 15 tons, meeting the Army's requirement for a lighter artillery piece. KSSL benefits from having an existing production infrastructure and extensive experience gained through years of internal research and development.

Reports suggest KSSL might propose the Bharat-52 at a unit cost of around ₹11-12 crore. This compares favourably to the estimated ₹22.8 crore per unit cost of the ATAGS, derived from the recent ₹7,000 crore contract for 307 units awarded earlier this month (March 2025) to KSSL and TASL. KSSL's cost efficiency is attributed to utilizing its current facilities, thus avoiding substantial new investments needed by competitors to set up similar production lines.

The aforementioned ATAGS contract was divided 60:40, with KSSL securing the larger share (184 guns) as the lowest bidder (L1), while TASL received the order for 123 guns. KSSL aims to maintain this competitive edge in the new TGS tender.

Baba Kalyani, Chairman of the Kalyani Group, has previously stated that the company's Pune facility possesses the capacity to produce "one gun per day," equating to over 350 guns annually. This production scalability seems well-suited to meet the Army's initial 400-unit requirement and the longer-term goal of 1,500 guns.

Furthermore, KSSL has a well-established supply chain for critical components like barrels and breech mechanisms, making the Bharat-52 a readily available and potentially cost-effective option.

Competitors face different scenarios. TASL, despite its role in the ATAGS program, would likely need to modify its existing design or develop a new, lighter gun variant specifically for the TGS tender, which would involve additional design and production setup costs.

L&T is collaborating with the state-owned Advanced Weapons and Equipment India Limited (AWEIL) to offer the Dhanush 155mm/52 caliber gun. This is an advanced version of the 155mm/45 caliber Dhanush already inducted into the Army, which itself is an upgraded Bofors design.

While the Dhanush benefits from AWEIL’s existing manufacturing base in Jabalpur and potentially lower development costs due to its public sector undertaking (PSU) heritage, its estimated unit cost (around ₹14.5 crore for the 45-caliber version) might increase for the 52-caliber model. The partnership model could also impact L&T's ability to compete on price against KSSL's integrated approach.

The TGS tender falls under the Buy (Indian-IDDM - Indigenously Designed, Developed and Manufactured) category, which stipulates that the equipment must be designed, developed, and produced within India with a minimum of 50% indigenous content. The Bharat-52 readily meets this requirement.

KSSL's long-term R&D has equipped the gun with features like an auxiliary power unit (APU) and an autoloading system, aligning with Army needs for mobility, automation, and firepower.

The Bharat-52 has also undergone trials with international customers, including Saudi Arabia, indicating its maturity. While the Dhanush platform is proven, adapting it to the 52-caliber configuration might present unforeseen technical hurdles, although AWEIL's experience makes significant technical failure unlikely.

Ultimately, cost is expected to be a critical factor in the Army's decision. At a potential ₹11-12 crore per unit, the Bharat-52 offers a nearly 50% cost reduction compared to the ATAGS unit price.

For the initial 400-gun order, choosing the Bharat-52 could potentially save the Ministry of Defence around ₹4,000 crore compared to procuring ATAGS-equivalent systems at the recently established price point. This significant potential saving, combined with KSSL's production readiness, makes the Bharat-52 a compelling option as the Indian Army continues its artillery modernization efforts.

Competitors like TASL and L&T may find it challenging to match this price without affecting their profit margins, given the need to recover costs associated with new or adapted production lines.
 
WIll be a great boost for indegenisation initiative and with the efficiency of KSSL, it will be great addition to our fire power. 👍👍
Pray that IA does not embark upon its decade long trial process hoping for a barrel burst 😇
 
Preferably only ATAGS must be inducted for standardisation and ease of Spares .If required very limited no of lighter Bharat 52 guns be inducted.
 
M777 is still unbeatable in light howitzer category. ATAGS is great for towed howitzer, K-9 Vajra is still king in mechanized howitzer.

Let our private companies compete and fight for replacements of foreign equipment. That's the only way they will pour their own money into R&D.
 
I believe IA should also consider inducting more quantities of mobile truck mounted 155mm guns too.
 
ATAGS cost include the cost of about 350 towing vehicles also.
Nope. The tender for the vehicles was issued separately in 2023. The cost of ATAGS, at 23 crores per unit, is purely for ATAGS. And then we had to buy the towing vehicles as well. So the actual cost of buying ATAGS is well over 3 times what someone else could have provided. All thanks to DRDO's ego.
 
Preferably only ATAGS must be inducted for standardisation and ease of Spares .If required very limited no of lighter Bharat 52 guns be inducted.
On the other hand, ATAGS has destroyed any hopes of standardisation. The army has thousands of trucks, all optimised for towing 15 ton guns. Special trucks are being purchased just for ATAGS, and ATAGS anyways costs well over twice that of competitors. Even the so-called super expensive French weapons were almost half the price of ATAGS (cost of trucks included in ATAGS). The Israelis were almost a third.
 
It would be better to select only 1 system & then go for Mass-production in Towed & Mounted versions to achieve Economy of Scales.
 
On the other hand, ATAGS has destroyed any hopes of standardisation. The army has thousands of trucks, all optimised for towing 15 ton guns. Special trucks are being purchased just for ATAGS, and ATAGS anyways costs well over twice that of competitors. Even the so-called super expensive French weapons were almost half the price of ATAGS (cost of trucks included in ATAGS). The Israelis were almost a third.
If the country has to be import-free, no harm if Indian industries are paid more. The money stays in India, providing jobs to Indians. Capabilities and capacities will then be built, and price reduces.
 
On the other hand, ATAGS has destroyed any hopes of standardisation. The army has thousands of trucks, all optimised for towing 15 ton guns. Special trucks are being purchased just for ATAGS, and ATAGS anyways costs well over twice that of competitors. Even the so-called super expensive French weapons were almost half the price of ATAGS (cost of trucks included in ATAGS). The Israelis were almost a third.
@Akshat is so annoyed that his favorite French Nexter artillery. Daily hits will come against ATAGS. Afterall he seems to have lost his commission on this.
 
I don't disagree. Pay more to Indian industry, sure. But don't be uncompetitive in the guise of being Indian, right? We also had Bharat 52, didn't we? It met all the requirements of the original tender. So order that, no? Why at all did MoD force IA to buy these token numbers of ATAGS? Just because DRDO made something, we don't have to buy it, right?

Not to mention, why at all did DRDO develop a gun which explicitly doesn't meet the critical parameters set by the army? It's not like the tech didn't exist. Israel and France had guns which met our needs, in the global space. In India, Bharat 52 was there. In fact, even OFB is making Dhanush in the 15 ton weight class. So we had the tech to meet the army's requirements in India, but DRDO intentionally didn't make it and then MoD forced the Army to give some orders to DRDO while they go and shop for another gun, which can actually be used for war instead of just doing photoshoots for world records. And ultimately who loses? The Indian Army, which pays triple the cost, without getting triple the budget.
15-18 tons makes no difference. As a gunner, I can tell you with confidence. Regarding costs, once numbers are increased, prices automatically will come down.
 
@Akshat is so annoyed that his favorite French Nexter artillery. Daily hits will come against ATAGS. Afterall he seems to have lost his commission on this.
I have seen it so many times on this site. @Akshat always comes up with facts. He might exaggerate now and then, but he is always correct with the facts and the numbers. And people, you seem to be one of them, who can't counter him with numbers always label him as a French agent or whatever, ranting about things but never even daring to counter with numbers as you guys seem to know that he is right. One of you, AK S, even admitted as much.

So why bother with all this ranting? This guy has never even suggested or promoted Nexter guns. Not even Athos. As far as I can recall, he is always vouching for Indian guns. Just not DRDO made ATAGS, for which he presents rather well laid out facts. And your inability to counter with data proves that even you know he is right but can't seem to digest that.
 
It’s absolutely clear that there’s several 155mm indigenous towed guns that’s available so we won’t need to make any foreign expensive imports.

Whichever Indian guns they choose from they need to make sure that they increase the amount of indigenous content, technology or raw materials to at least 90% and above. This will be to our benefit in the long term as we can always manufacture another large batch with more indigenous content to above 95% or more.
 
On the other hand, ATAGS has destroyed any hopes of standardisation. The army has thousands of trucks, all optimised for towing 15 ton guns. Special trucks are being purchased just for ATAGS, and ATAGS anyways costs well over twice that of competitors. Even the so-called super expensive French weapons were almost half the price of ATAGS (cost of trucks included in ATAGS). The Israelis were almost a third.
The trucks can be used elsewhere. Already, many of them must have outlived their life or are on the verge of being scrapped within the next 5 to 7 years. Saw some of them whilst travelling to Amritsar. Almost in junk condition with a brigade on the move.
 
15-18 tons makes no difference. As a gunner, I can tell you with confidence. Regarding costs, once numbers are increased, prices automatically will come down.
15-18 tons makes all the difference buddy. Army's trucks can tow 15 tons but can't tow 18 tons. It's as simple as that.

Regarding cost, as I mentioned, Israel was offering half the price for Athos. It has no other client. IDF does operate a few units, of course. But they gave half the price bro! Along with 70% local content as well. And that is without the cost of the trucks added. So no, price will never ever come down enough. Not near enough. As for numbers, it is clear that army has only placed these orders out of pittance and to satisfy the ego of DRDO. Another tender, for 15 ton guns, has already been started. So larger numbers will never be placed as the gun simply fails to meet the needs of the army. It has been officially proven now. I have always said this and I stand vindicated with this order.
 
The trucks can be used elsewhere. Already, many of them must have outlived their life or are on the verge of being scrapped within the next 5 to 7 years. Saw some of them whilst travelling to Amritsar. Almost in junk condition with a brigade on the move.
But there were still many more. When we were planning to buy Athos, no such need of extra guns was ever mentioned. This means enough trucks were available. This means the cost of the trucks has to be exclusively added to ATAGS and ATAGS alone.
 
On the other hand, ATAGS has destroyed any hopes of standardisation. The army has thousands of trucks, all optimised for towing 15 ton guns. Special trucks are being purchased just for ATAGS, and ATAGS anyways costs well over twice that of competitors. Even the so-called super expensive French weapons were almost half the price of ATAGS (cost of trucks included in ATAGS). The Israelis were almost a third.
I don't agree. Same ATAGS gun will be used for the ATAGS MGS. Maybe the same truck chasis as well.

Let's see what happens.
 
I don't disagree. Pay more to Indian industry, sure. But don't be uncompetitive in the guise of being Indian, right? We also had Bharat 52, didn't we? It met all the requirements of the original tender. So order that, no? Why at all did MoD force IA to buy these token numbers of ATAGS? Just because DRDO made something, we don't have to buy it, right?

Not to mention, why at all did DRDO develop a gun which explicitly doesn't meet the critical parameters set by the army? It's not like the tech didn't exist. Israel and France had guns which met our needs, in the global space. In India, Bharat 52 was there. In fact, even OFB is making Dhanush in the 15 ton weight class. So we had the tech to meet the army's requirements in India, but DRDO intentionally didn't make it and then MoD forced the Army to give some orders to DRDO while they go and shop for another gun, which can actually be used for war instead of just doing photoshoots for world records. And ultimately who loses? The Indian Army, which pays triple the cost, without getting triple the budget.
Give it a bit of time, infrastructure cost absorption and economies of scale while ordering, ATAGS price also will reduce. Kalyanis did the same and now they are fielding a cheaper gun. No nation will prosper because foreign products are cheap. Just look at imports from Bharat to get the picture. Most probably, you must be using a Chinese mobile for its cheap price.
 
M777 is still unbeatable in light howitzer category. ATAGS is great for towed howitzer, K-9 Vajra is still king in mechanized howitzer.

Let our private companies compete and fight for replacements of foreign equipment. That's the only way they will pour their own money into R&D.
Kalyani has an ultra-light gun which is close to the M777 in weight, about 4+ tons. If any further air liftable guns are needed, we should go indigenous.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,389
Messages
47,610
Members
2,989
Latest member
Clorox flavor ice cream
Back
Top