Authorities Impose Sixty-Day Restriction on Civilian Movement Near Kathua International Border to Safeguard Against Cross-Border Firing

To safeguard the lives of villagers living close to the international border from cross-border firing, the District Magistrate in Jammu and Kashmir's Kathua district on Saturday imposed restrictions on movement within five km of the international border.

An order issued by Rajesh Sharma, District Magistrate Kathua, said on Saturday, “Whereas, the security situation in the border areas has become sensitive and there is a possibility for cross-border firing at any time. The movement in border areas is required to be restricted to ensure the utmost safety of the villagers and prevent any anti-national activities."

Sharma further said that to check these kinds of activities in the border areas, "I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for proceedings under section 163 BNSS for immediate prevention of danger to human life and disturbance to public tranquility, and it is necessary to impose restrictions to restrict unnecessary movement in border areas."

“Now, therefore, I, Rajesh Sharma, JKAS, District Magistrate, Kathua in exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 163 BNSS, do hereby restrict unnecessary movement in the border area in a strip of 5 Km from the International Border in Area of Responsibility of the Unit i.e. from BOP (Border Outpost) Paharpur forward to BOP (Border Outpost) Karol Krishna between. Moreover, movement of heavy vehicles, including trucks, tippers and multi-axle vehicles is prohibited on the old Samba-Kathua road from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.

He said the order shall come into force from Saturday and shall remain in force for a period of Sixty Days from the date of its issuance or if rescinded, whichever is earlier.

“Since it is not possible to serve prior notice of this order, it is as such being issued ex parte and addressed to the public in general. Any violation of this order shall invite punitive action under Section 223 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita”, the order said.

It must be mentioned that during tension on the international border in J&K, restrictions are imposed in areas very close to the border so that civilians living in these areas don’t become victims of Pakistan’s shelling/firing.

 

CRPF pays solemn tribute to forty brave martyrs on 7th anniversary of Pulwama terror attack

Russia Willing to Share Tech for Integrating S-70 Stealth Drones with Indian Su-57 Fighters, Offering Advanced MUMT for IAF

[ronin-desi]

Front like combat role not allowed in even most Woke European, USA but this file phot shows woman patrolling among man.
Such woke mindshet need to be curtailed and reversed in defence forces. Admin or support role away from combat, border need to be observed. even woman themselves dont like to work with themselves call it Hen house for reason.

 

[netram]

Front like combat role not allowed in even most Woke European, USA but this file phot shows woman patrolling among man.
Such woke mindshet need to be curtailed and reversed in defence forces. Admin or support role away from combat, border need to be observed. even woman themselves dont like to work with themselves call it Hen house for reason.

While I am not a fan of women in frontline combat roles esp. patrolling(considering India doesn't face a recruiting shortage), Your argument is just plain stupid.
There are far more worse examples of "woke" in India than the Armed forces employing women to patrol near border fencings.
What you don't realise is that, If these women turn out to be a physical burden on their peers sooner or later that information will come out, and thats all the iron clad reasoning you'd need to kick them out of patrolling duties(weakening their argument for we are equals" and undermining their entitlement to be presence in combat roles).
Women are Equal to Men only if they can prove that they are.
If women have the physical fitness and logistical adaptivity that men have, the sure. But without that, randomly labelling anything as woke just because someone has been given an opportunity just weakens your argument and makes you look irrevocably stupid.

 

[ronin-desi]

i dont argue y

While I am not a fan of women in frontline combat roles esp. patrolling(considering India doesn't face a recruiting shortage), Your argument is just plain stupid.
There are far more worse examples of "woke" in India than the Armed forces employing women to patrol near border fencings.
What you don't realise is that, If these women turn out to be a physical burden on their peers sooner or later that information will come out, and thats all the iron clad reasoning you'd need to kick them out of patrolling duties(weakening their argument for we are equals" and undermining their entitlement to be presence in combat roles).
Women are Equal to Men only if they can prove that they are.
If women have the physical fitness and logistical adaptivity that men have, the sure. But without that, randomly labelling anything as woke just because someone has been given an opportunity just weakens your argument and makes you look irrevocably stupid.

cannot argue with idiots as they beat you with their experience.

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

but here is 2025 incident where perfectly safe environment away from combat zone, dust, fire, shelling and noise but they couldnt carry coffin ~200kg. in this video evidence assumed 4 on each side all together 8 soldiers. These women proved weak link. 200/8 = 25 kg per head.
if they were struggling on this easy weight, how would they move shell to load on cannon. or any def equipment as its normal to 20-30kg hardware or crate to move around.
you plain clown and hard core nuts communist. no one can and should even waster time on your blabbering.