French Rafale Jet's Rising Costs and Rigid Contracts Could Soon Deter Potential Buyers, Opening Door for KF-21 and Tejas Mk2

French Rafale Jet's Rising Costs and Rigid Contracts Could Soon Deter Potential Buyers, Opening Door for KF-21 and Tejas Mk2


For many years, the Dassault Rafale, a multirole fighter jet from France, has been recognized globally for its advanced technology, adaptability, and proven combat record.

However, the Rafale's dominance might soon be challenged, not by established rivals such as the F-35 or Su-57, but by two newer aircraft: South Korea's KF-21 Boramae and India's Tejas Mk2.

These emerging fighters offer similar, and in some cases, superior, capabilities at a significantly lower price point, highlighting what some analysts view as a vulnerability in the Rafale's business model: its high cost.

The Rafale has always been positioned as a high-end product, with a price to match. While its sophisticated radar, electronic warfare capabilities, and versatility have secured contracts in countries like India, Qatar, and Egypt, the associated long-term costs are becoming a concern.

Maintenance, upgrades, and the integration of weapons systems for the Rafale are expensive, a financial burden that some nations are finding increasingly difficult to justify.

India's experience provides a clear example. In 2016, India agreed to purchase 36 Rafale jets for approximately $8.7 billion, a deal intended to significantly enhance its air force capabilities.

However, integrating India's own domestically-produced weapons, such as the Astra air-to-air missile and the Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon (SAAW), has resulted in substantial additional expenses.

Reports indicate that India is spending millions more to adapt these systems to the French aircraft, a cost that might have been avoided with a more flexible platform.

This issue of high upgrade costs is not limited to India; it is a recurring problem for Rafale operators, and it is starting to diminish the aircraft's attractiveness.

The KF-21 Boramae and Tejas Mk2 are emerging as strong competitors, offering competitive performance at a more affordable price.

The KF-21, a 4.5-generation fighter developed by Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) in South Korea, is designed to compete with aircraft like the Rafale and Eurofighter Typhoon.

Featuring an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, advanced avionics, and compatibility with a broad range of current weapons, the KF-21 presents an attractive package.

Its estimated unit cost is around $65 million, significantly less than the Rafale's estimated price of over $120 million. The final cost of Rafale is subject to the specific configuration and associated equipment, but publicly available figures and estimates consistently place it well above the KF-21.

India's Tejas Mk2, an improved version of the domestically-produced Tejas Mk1, is expected to be operational by the late 2020s. It boasts an upgraded GE F414 engine, improved avionics, and seamless integration with Indian-made weapons like the Astra and BrahMos missiles.

The Tejas Mk2 is designed for affordability and self-sufficiency. With an estimated price of $50-60 million per unit, it is considerably cheaper than the Rafale while offering a level of customization that Dassault has been less willing to provide.

A key advantage of both the KF-21 and Tejas Mk2 is their cost-effective design. They are built with open architectures, simplifying weapons integration and upgrades, and therefore reducing the long-term financial strain on the countries operating them. For nations that are wary of France's high pricing and strict contract terms, these aircraft offer a more appealing alternative.

Beyond the financial aspect, the KF-21 and Tejas Mk2 are also making technological advancements. The KF-21's AESA radar, developed by Hanwha Systems, is comparable to the Rafale's RBE2-AA, and its electronic warfare system is designed for advanced survivability.

South Korea has also collaborated with international partners, including Lockheed Martin, ensuring the aircraft benefits from established expertise without the high costs associated with a completely Western-developed platform.

The Tejas Mk2 leverages India's expanding defence manufacturing capabilities. Its Uttam AESA radar and locally-produced missile systems provide a solution tailored to India's needs and those of potential export customers.

While the Rafale often requires costly modifications to integrate non-French weapons, the Tejas Mk2 is designed to incorporate India's existing weaponry from the outset, a potential advantage for buyers in Asia and other regions.

Dassault's strategy for Rafale sales has faced criticism for being focused on short-term gains. The company's insistence on high profit margins and its reluctance to share technology or reduce costs has reportedly created frustration among customers. India's Rafale deal, for example, did not include substantial offsets or local production, requiring New Delhi to bear the full cost of any upgrades.

By contrast, South Korea and India are promoting the KF-21 and Tejas Mk2 with more adaptable terms, including technology transfers and co-production agreements. These incentives could be decisive for air forces with limited budgets.

As global defence spending becomes more constrained, nations are increasingly prioritizing value for money. The Rafale's premium image may have been sufficient in a less competitive market, but with the KF-21 and Tejas Mk2 entering the scene, potential buyers now have alternative options that do not require such a significant financial commitment.
 
Are we still going to keep up this charade that the Tejas Mk 2 will somehow cost only 50-60 million USD apiece? We are paying just north of 80 million USD apiece for the Tejas Mk 1A (in the 97 aircraft order). The Tejas Mk 2 will be more expensive.

Oh, and the Rafale actually has massive export sales, and the KF-21 has massive export interest. The Tejas Mk 2 has neither, and in a world where you have stuff like the Gripen E, F-16V, KF-21, J-10, and others, the Tejas Mk 2 is going to have a difficult time finding export customers, especially given the fact that it is still 7-8 years away from induction and HAL is renowned for its inefficiency.
 
I have been saying this again and again. They have never even met 10% of the offset obligation. They are looters.
 
This is the key point to take note of here. Dassault's obsession with high profit margins, reluctance to share technology, and unwillingness to offer negotiated lower costs have been to the great disadvantage of India, which has been a long-time loyal customer. The French have tasted big money from India, so they think sharing technology will lose an easy but repeat customer forever. India should abstain from buying from the French.
 
Cancel all Rafale fighter deals and go for 2 squadrons of F-35s and 2 squadrons of Su-57s off the shelf.
1. Cancelling the Rafale M deal would leave us with a problem as far as naval fighters goes.

2. The US hasn't offered the F-35. There is a difference between a formal offer and expressing a willingness to sell something.

3. "Both" the Su-57 and the F-35 together isn't something that is going to happen. Once (and if) we get one, the other one is practically locked out. It is one or the other or neither.
 
India's AMCA program to build a 5th generation fighter is not a joint collaboration with Dassault. India may not stop buying Rafale jets, as we need to maintain a good relationship with the French. As far as I know, India is not working with any other country to develop 5th gen aircraft.
 
Are we still going to keep up this charade that the Tejas Mk 2 will somehow cost only 50-60 million USD apiece? We are paying just north of 80 million USD apiece for the Tejas Mk 1A (in the 97 aircraft order). The Tejas Mk 2 will be more expensive.

Oh, and the Rafale actually has massive export sales, and the KF-21 has massive export interest. The Tejas Mk 2 has neither, and in a world where you have stuff like the Gripen E, F-16V, KF-21, J-10, and others, the Tejas Mk 2 is going to have a difficult time finding export customers, especially given the fact that it is still 7-8 years away from induction and HAL is renowned for its inefficiency.
Contract value without GST is about $42m/jet for MK1A. Kindly share the source for $80m per jet.

As far as Mk2 is concerned, we have to wait for it to fly, ideally to be inducted, which is a good 5+ years away. Realistically, we may not have spare capacity for exports. The IAF chief says we need 40 jets per year.

Will it undercut Rafale globally? I doubt it. Will it undercut Rafale in India? Most likely.
 
1. Cancelling the Rafale M deal would leave us with a problem as far as naval fighters goes.

2. The US hasn't offered the F-35. There is a difference between a formal offer and expressing a willingness to sell something.

3. "Both" the Su-57 and the F-35 together isn't something that is going to happen. Once (and if) we get one, the other one is practically locked out. It is one or the other or neither.
I can see French meltdown.

F-35 is very much on the table now. Su-57 is still not fully finished. One can talk about it only hypothetically. So, hypothetically, if finished, it will challenge both Rafale and F-35. All in all, French dominance in MRFA is substantially eroded. And the French can blame only themselves... exorbitant acquisition costs and exploitative ToT and upgrades. They have been sparring with TKM for the level of ToT in the proposed submarine deal, which the French didn't even qualify for.

Tell your master to make amends, or else they'll lose.
 
Tejas Mk2, a baby under mother's womb.

South Korean KF-21 Boramae is like a child with exceptional ability but takes 5 years to mature & reach its full potential.

I don't know why any country would purchase Tejas Mk2 if they had a decent budget. KF-21 Boramae will cost 85-100 million dollars per piece in fly-away condition, but comes with US-made BVR missiles.
 
I was taking this article seriously, then saw the name of Tejas Mk2. Which sane country in its senses will choose the Tejas Mk2 ahead of Rafales?
 
I believe it's possible that the South Korean jet will attract export contracts, but I just don't see that happening with the Tejas Mk-2 due to HAL's shoddy and inefficient work culture. It will be surprising if they even manage to cater to the IAF's needs, let alone export sales.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,095
Messages
44,779
Members
2,857
Latest member
Rishi
Back
Top