Indian Military May Ditch Adani Drishti 10 UAV as Trials Show Mixed Results and Focus Shifts to Dedicated MALE UAVs

Drishti-10-Medium-altitude-drone-adaniaerospa.webp


The Indian military's pursuit of a reliable Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) has taken a new turn as the Adani Drishti 10, initially procured for testing, appears to be falling short of expectations, particularly for the Indian Army.

This development comes as both the Army and Navy are gearing up to issue a tender for the procurement of 76 MALE UAVs, signaling a shift towards dedicated platforms that can fulfill their specific operational requirements.

The Drishti 10, a locally manufactured version of Israel's Hermes 900, was acquired by the Army and Navy as an interim solution due to delays in the larger MALE UAV procurement program. The aim was to assess its suitability while awaiting a more comprehensive procurement initiative.

However, sources reveal that the Drishti 10's performance in high-altitude operations, crucial for the Army's deployments in challenging terrains like the Himalayas, has been less than satisfactory.

While the Navy has found the Drishti 10 to be adequate for its maritime surveillance needs, where altitude is less critical, the Army's need for a UAV capable of operating effectively in the high-altitude environment of the northern borders remains unmet. This disparity in performance requirements has led both services to prioritize the acquisition of dedicated MALE UAVs through a fresh tender.

The upcoming tender, seeking 60 units for the Army, 12 for the Air Force, and 4 for the Navy, is expected to attract bids from several global manufacturers. In line with the government's "Make in India" initiative, all contenders will be required to ensure local manufacturing within India.

This move is expected to boost the indigenous defence industry, with companies vying to participate by either collaborating with foreign technology providers or offering domestically developed platforms.

The procurement of these MALE UAVs is crucial for bolstering India's unmanned aerial capabilities and will play a significant role in reconnaissance, surveillance, target acquisition, and intelligence gathering. While the Drishti 10 served as a temporary measure, its mixed performance has highlighted the need for specialized platforms tailored to the specific needs of each service.

This situation also underscores the growing importance of indigenous defence manufacturing. As India seeks to reduce its reliance on imports and develop critical technologies domestically, the MALE UAV program presents a significant opportunity for the Indian defene industry to showcase its capabilities and contribute to the nation's self-reliance in defence technology.

Although the future of the Drishti 10 in the Indian military remains uncertain, particularly with the Army, the Navy's relative satisfaction with its performance might still lead to limited follow-up orders. The focus, however, is clearly on the upcoming MALE UAV tender, which promises to be a pivotal step in shaping India's future unmanned aerial capabilities.
 
Those who are advocating for Drishti 10 and rejecting Tapas... This is an eye opener for them... This drone can not fly at 30000 feet altitude and won't have 24 hrs endurance... Tapas has achieved 28000 feet altitude and 18 hrs endurance with all payload...
 
This will be the opportunity for our own OEMs & DRDO to tighten their belts & come up with competitive & cost effective tech., . Compete, prove & win..👍✌️
 
Those who are advocating for Drishti 10 and rejecting Tapas... This is an eye opener for them... This drone can not fly at 30000 feet altitude and won't have 24 hrs endurance... Tapas has achieved 28000 feet altitude and 18 hrs endurance with all payload...
Tapas is also an cost effective solution.
 
Those who are advocating for Drishti 10 and rejecting Tapas... This is an eye opener for them... This drone can not fly at 30000 feet altitude and won't have 24 hrs endurance... Tapas has achieved 28000 feet altitude and 18 hrs endurance with all payload...
And forces are forced to buy it inspite of it falling short of qualification. Why ? Lack of tech ? Cost ? You know that govt if need be can allocate and buy what is required if it is in March too. Why should forces settle for non-qualified product ?
 
It is foolish to go for a common platform since each service has different requirements & it will be difficult to find one which satisfies the 3 wings of the military. A classic example for importing where some requirements will be conveniently left out to purchase imported maal. Let us see the ultimate one which will be shortlisted.
 
And forces are forced to buy it inspite of it falling short of qualification. Why ? Lack of tech ? Cost ? You know that govt if need be can allocate and buy what is required if it is in March too. Why should forces settle for non-qualified product ?
Forces themselves will compromise to purchase import maal & couple of requirements will be conveniently forgotten.
 
Forces themselves will compromise to purchase import maal & couple of requirements will be conveniently forgotten.
if that was always the case, then why didnt the forces tweak the requirements for Dhristi 10. Because this drone didnt satisfy the army either. Stop blaming the army for DRDO's TAPAS failure
 
And forces are forced to buy it inspite of it falling short of qualification. Why ? Lack of tech ? Cost ? You know that govt if need be can allocate and buy what is required if it is in March too. Why should forces settle for non-qualified product ?
I think Govt wanted adani to establish the Drone facility so that they can supply to Israelis. Maybe a Token order was given to hide the fact that India will be supplying these to israel .
As the decision to buy these drones by army was taken in haste just b4 the israeli war.
 
TAPAS is yet to clear the quality requirements.
Its still plagued by engine related issues. Underpowered.
Well the really messy thing is lack of clarity from the Armed forces!! While Navy need a drone for vast surveillance so it's need is long endurance, while army and airforce need is high altitude and long endurance!!
The messy thing here is that they want a system of hale class drones(of course costly) but they name it Medium class and cost effective solution!!

Tapas is good in it's own class but it is not been good in the Himalayas or hilly areas for the Army need.

It will be time consuming and will be long delay progress untill they clarify about the things!!
On paper companies claim can be another thing but a satisfactory results for the need of Armed forces are a different thing!!
 
Let Navy use a mix of Tapas, Dhristi and MQ9 B as Army and IAF can choose other suitable models for them. There is no need for one size fits all. Besides, Atma Nirbhar idea must be fully implemented for this.
 
India needs to design, develop and manufacture with indigenous content our own drones. We should develop more armed drones which can be used for ISTAR missions along with EW etc. If the private sector can develop one within a few years then we should definitely buy them.

Also we need to quickly focus on developing our stealth UCAV Ghatak which is a crucial project. We developed the SWIFT which is a smaller technology demonstrated version of it and we have been given permission to develop the larger version of it. This is the most important project which will increase our fire power and used for ISTAR missions and capabilities.
 
Those who are advocating for Drishti 10 and rejecting Tapas... This is an eye opener for them... This drone can not fly at 30000 feet altitude and won't have 24 hrs endurance... Tapas has achieved 28000 feet altitude and 18 hrs endurance with all payload...

Those who are advocating for Drishti 10 and rejecting Tapas... This is an eye opener for them... This drone can not fly at 30000 feet altitude and won't have 24 hrs endurance... Tapas has achieved 28000 feet altitude and 18 hrs endurance with all payload...
Sir, Neither is "TAPAS",🤨
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,115
Messages
30,541
Members
1,809
Latest member
Rajesh M
Back
Top