India's AMCA: Why a Powerful Engine is the Key to Dominating the Skies

The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program is India's ticket to owning the future of air combat. At the core of this ambitious project, the Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) is making bold moves with a next-generation engine that could give the AMCA a decisive edge.

Speed without Sacrifice​

Imagine a fighter jet that can break the sound barrier without burning through its fuel reserves. That's the power of "supercruise", and the GTRE engine aims to do just that with its remarkable dry thrust.

For the AMCA, this translates to lightning-fast response times and the ability to cover huge distances quickly – crucial for both offensive and defensive missions.

Built for India's Challenges​

Heat and dry air – conditions that can limit a jet engine's performance – are a reality for India. The GTRE's design specifically targets this problem. This engine is built to deliver consistent power even in harsh climates, making sure AMCA pilots have the muscle they need, when they need it.

Power to Rival the Best​

This engine isn't just about efficiency; it packs a punch. When afterburners kick in, expect power levels on par with the engines in India's current workhorse, the Su-30MKI. This gives the AMCA the raw force to go head-to-head with the world's best fighter aircraft.

Beyond the AMCA​

The technology powering the AMCA won't stay confined to one program. This engine has the potential to pave the way for India's future 6th-generation fighter jets, ensuring the country stays at the leading edge of aerial combat.

The Path to Self-Reliance​

Success with this engine is about more than just better planes. It's a leap forward for India's aerospace industry, proving the nation's ability to mastermind and build the most sophisticated jet engine technology independently.

 

[charminar_waale_ismail_bhai]

The private sector doesn't either.

You are so wrong about that, birader.
There are private players specializing in manufacturing of small turbo-jet engines in India.
Furthermore major players like Kirlosakars and Godrej have enough huamn capital to develop jet engines.

Point is, is the GoI ready to hand out carrots?
So far, they are busy pouring more money into non-performance without anybody getting penalised for bad work.

 

[RG]

India has access to 130KN class engine, and it should in first iteration focus on using proven tech and design to have this class of engine. Beg, borrow and steal has been done by others to develop their own tech, why should it be anything different. It should involve partners and private industry who can help in refining individual parts and components to reduce time and cycle. Flying test bed is must. it would be beneficial to start off shoots of whatever success is achieved rather than considering the target only as a measure of success or failure.

 

[ABHIJIT APSINGIKAR]

Probably. I mean, we are comparing who is the bigger zero out of the 2. So sure.

Its like both ADE and GTRE are fail candidates in school. While one (ADE) is just an abject failure who gets whacked from his parents regularly for shoddy performance in report card, the other (GTRE), not just fails in exams but goes one step ahead to forge parent signatures and misreport his grades, only to be found during parent--teachers meeting and would be doubly punished for failure and forgery.

 

[Akshat]

we already worked with 15 foreign engines till now, but never learned anything, where as all he Countries who makes engines now learned from German engine tech after World war 2.

And the same thing will be repeated if you give this project to GTRE/HAL.

 

[Akshat]

This is wrong approach as we should work on all classes of engines from cutting edge, from less powerful to most powerful. No telling where the break through will be had, but it activates a system of both R&D and incorporating latest technology. What if we find a new super alloys/composite material/ ceramic/ and so on that can handle higher trust, then India can move to next level and compete.

You don’t just ‘find’ stuff. It needs billions of computations and thousands of carefully crafted experiments.

 

[beencensured]

You don’t just ‘find’ stuff. It needs billions of computations and thousands of carefully crafted experiments.

Age of petaflops and exaflops, and the we have you.

 

[Rajesh]

What ever they make for amca should have the potential to be upgraded to 150 kn which can be used for su-30 replacement program.

 

[Rajesh]

So due to failure one must stop trying things, every thing at start has some issues.

Still not able to select the engine for AMCA mk2 and then delay is going to happen for sure!!

Then only import from France can happen and their proxies can make money . For some drdo should shut rather than rectifying the problem and moving on so imports can happen without an option.

 

[Akshat]

Age of petaflops and exaflops, and the we have you.

Shows how much research you have done irl. Petaflops and all don’t work on their own. You need to do real life calculations first and input them as parameters. Only after that’s done can you expect the computers to do their job.

 

[Pad UwU]

Only an amateur will say "Hey this is number 1 or this is number 2 in jet engines". I expected more from you. You can't compare Toyota with Maruti and say Maruti is better because they sell more cars. Toyota is more known for reliability and Maruti for cheap cars.

Coming to RR. They are absolutely useless. Even for Adour engines they have to import compressors. You can go and check on Eurojets own website. Workshare is listed there.

As for Safran. They make what is needed by France. Dassault needs a 75 kN engine, and it is made by them. Dassault now is making a 6th gen plane, and Safran is making an engine for it. India is asking for an engine, and they are ready. India asked for help with Kaveri, they gave it. The cost of the entire project though turned out to be way too much for us. Now US surely is number 1, no doubt. In almost every parameter. But after that, China and Russia do have higher thrust engines. But France has more reliable engines. But the fact is, Russia and China have tried to increase reliability but failed. But France hasn't tried high thrust engines. They will do that with the 6th gen planes (in collab with others, of course). RR is not even in the top 4 when it comes to engines as they simply cannot make an entire engine on their own. Not even an engine from the 60s.

No, how can I and others would believe that RR is useless when the company is still standing still🧐🤔... Adour engine is old design AFAIK we also manufacturing it with Indian variant...
About Safran, you spouting that they reliable 😁
Now send us a proper comparison of each engines reliability... PS don't compare old adour to current m88...
Just give true not bias data of
Ej200 vs m88... Doesn't matter if RR only 1/3 contribution on the ej200

 

[Pad UwU]

Eurojets own site has the date of RR's failure. It gives the exact workshare agreement. Similarly, you can check the dry thrust by weight ration of M88 vs say F404 if you wanna compare.

The info I give is always fool proof and backed by sources. There are many others who fail to provide sources, especially the French haters on this site.

RR failure doesn't mean ej200 is failure bruh... F404 is best against m88.... Same ej200 is better against m88..

Yeah I googled it... But still can't understand whats your pointing about RR is failure but still standing still 😹😅