SSS Defence CEO Criticizes Govt Decision to Acquire Foreign SIG 716i Rifles Despite Better Indigenous Alternatives Available

sss%20defence.jpg


New Delhi: The Indian government's recent decision to procure an additional 73,000 SIG 716 assault rifles from US manufacturer Sig Sauer Inc. has sparked intense debate. Vivek Krishnan, CEO of Bengaluru-based SSS Defence, expressed his frustration on social media, criticizing the government's ongoing preference for foreign-made weapons despite the much-touted "Make in India" initiative.

In a five-point post, Krishnan highlighted the difficulties faced by domestic defence manufacturers in competing with foreign companies, particularly when the government prioritizes imports over local production. He emphasized that SSS Defence, a company with a 70-year history and an emerging player in the Indian defence sector, has been diligently developing world-class small arms, yet these efforts seem overlooked.

Krishnan began his post by expressing disappointment with the government's decision, stating that a private solicitation with an emphasis on Indian design and content would have easily identified suitable domestic contenders. He questioned the seriousness of the "Make in India" initiative in the defence sector, pointing out hurdles faced by Indian manufacturers and stressing the need for greater support and patience to foster indigenous weapon development.

He further criticized the government, stating that the private sector is attempting to undo the damage inflicted by government-owned companies over the years in defence manufacturing. He challenged the Indian Army to test SSS Defence's rifles against global benchmarks and make the results public, as "real serious armies" do.

Krishnan's post triggered a debate, with several prominent journalists, ex-servicemen, commentators, and former bureaucrats voicing their opinions. Ravi Kumar Gupta, a former DRDO scientist and commentator, backed Krishnan and urged Indian decision-makers to take his challenge seriously. He emphasized the need to listen to industry voices and give due consideration to what Indian companies can produce domestically.

Gupta directly urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to address Krishnan's concerns, stressing the importance of comparing indigenously made weapons with those from other countries. He expressed hope that the Army would accept Krishnan's challenge honestly, overcoming the lure of imports and kickbacks.

This incident highlights the ongoing struggle faced by domestic defence manufacturers in India, even as the government promotes the "Make in India" initiative. It underscores the need for greater transparency and support for local companies to strengthen India's defence capabilities and reduce reliance on foreign imports.
 
Whoever is criticizing the Govt. must understand that we have to keep buying from the US to keep the CIA away from interfering into our political system. If American corporations aren't happy then their Economic Hitman, CIA will topple the existing Govt. and bring someone else into power who would give even bigger deals to them. So relax, this is a balancing game. India cannot ignore the American Corporations' interests if she wants to maintain the regional peace and stability.
Than buy choppers, IStar, etc.. for which we donot have a base or have not competency developed. Why a platform which we have a own robust product? Want to kill the sectors?
 
Than buy choppers, IStar, etc.. for which we donot have a base or have not competency developed. Why a platform which we have a own robust product? Want to kill the sectors?
Precisely. +1000.
 
Guys, our soldiers and officers lives are very precious and hundreds of them are dying every year at LoC.
So no wait for domestic developers at all.
Actually, India must order more Tranches of Sig Sauer 716s and save soldiers and officers lives.

Each rifle costs about Rs. 1 lakh and it is dirt cheap for GoI and MoD to be haggling with.
 
What is difference between make in India tagging fashion by BJP government and old practice of getting production of copied collaborative or inspired product in old days ?
 
They already decided to buy it so we shouldn't waste our energy on it. If we think that corruption in the deal or appeasement to US then we need evidence to support it.
Probably better to buy more of the same even if its not ideal than go for 3-4 different products. The sheer variety of srms and ammunition currently in use will cause problems in a war.
 
Bharat should have gone for under Make in India instead of importing with Indigenous content its would have been easy for repair & maintainace for SIG-716 Rifle
irony is that no one will question govt, opposition is so anti business that it will prefer import than giving the order to local manufacturer
 
Whoever is criticizing the Govt. must understand that we have to keep buying from the US to keep the CIA away from interfering into our political system. If American corporations aren't happy then their Economic Hitman, CIA will topple the existing Govt. and bring someone else into power who would give even bigger deals to them. So relax, this is a balancing game. India cannot ignore the American Corporations' interests if she wants to maintain the regional peace and stability.
We are buying 400 or so strykers, isn't that enough
 
Sell it to the Americans. And when they resell it back to us, then our Imported Army would happily purchase it .
 
What more do you expect from a world class fighting force led by tier 2 officers supported by a crooked bureaucracy?
 
Krishnan, There has to be something or some drawback which Indian defence ministry must have considered. Yes We want to modernize military with latest equipments. There has to be a reason for this. So maybe some drawbacks. Just you cannot say make in India means purchase my products. Instead try to find out the flaws and rectify it.
 
I really feel sorry for sss defence. Even after putting thier heart and soul into it, and trying to get on board the fake train of atmanirbhar bharat advertised by gov, they are not even given a chance to compete. First, they were ousted in carbine race by financial clause and now this. Atleast they should have got a chance to compete among the best by putting thier products under trial. But then, what can we say about IA procurement which is world famous as Import Army. Any sane country would have worked with thier startups to get thier products developed, tested, inducted and refined. But our IA, does the opposite and goes around town that we brown skinned people are not capable of developing even a basic rifle. Just look at colt rifle development from 1962 to present day and how many rifle version has been released. They didn't get into blame game, because they have long term vision while we have myopia at best.
And then we have the flawed L1 system, where LMT is given order for ASMI. What further r&d will LMT do in small arms that we can expect in future or is that what exactly IA wants.
The only silver lining is, DRDO has been smart enough to slowly move away from IA related equipments. IA will understand thier mistakes during wartime.
Nobody is stopping him for carrying out comparisons.
 
We are buying 400 or so strykers, isn't that enough
Actually no we aren’t. The government haven’t said that they are buying those vehicles and all they said was to evaluate the vehicles. You should read news more carefully and from which source which have their own agenda.
 
If u want to give Americans, give something we don't have. Not kill our own industries, because that's exactly what the Americans, west and chinese want.
Our industry has just about started and growing in the private sector and there’s still no guarantee that their products would meet the military’s requirements and tests. They put in very stringent standards and requirements that even many foreign guns don’t pass the tests. For the last 15 years the military have rejected every Indian gun that was developed in India as well.
 
Why small arms are not yet on the negative import list despite local companies designing and producing them - because then corrupt ministers and officers cannot pocket bribes. Seriously if this continues then we can forget local innovation in defense. The current government has made Make in India campaign mostly useless with these imports.
First understand what has been happening and what’s led to this.

Also let me prove to you how and why the government isn’t at fault and why they went with this deal. Trials and Negotiation to buy the AK 203 and Sig started from around 2016 or even earlier because the military kept on rejecting all indigenous guns that was developed for the last 15 years. Our military was running dangerously low on active service guns which were acceptable and safe to use and most had already been in service for around 40 years which is way past its lifespan. Also on top of that our army were in a state of war against Pakistan already with cross border firings, surgical strikes and terrorist strikes on a daily basis and in 2016 when we conducted our cross border strike it showed some of our weaknesses with the rest of the army units manning the border as they didn’t have proper, reliable or modern guns which is when they started searching and negotiating to import the guns or make it in India. Then in 2019 we had the balakot strike and the government had to make a decisive decision on manufacturing the Ak203 in India and to import the Sig guns based on the price, ToT, quality and the shortest possible time frame to get them in service which is how they came this these deals and the urgency.

At that stage SSS had only just started the company and beginning to develop new weapons. They didn’t have the large manufacturing capability to meet such a large order in such a short time and didn’t have the financial security requirement in the bank which is necessary on large scale orders. Unfortunately they arrived too late and didn’t meet the requirements.
 
Someone in Army procurement muzzled made in India probably for personal gain. American paid huge money plus other gifts to entice purchase Corruption exist in our Armed services
No it’s very difficult for the military to receive bribes and get away with them because of the strict rules and checks. Read my answer above for you to understand why we made this purchase.
 
Bharat should have gone for under Make in India instead of importing with Indigenous content its would have been easy for repair & maintainace for SIG-716 Rifle
Read my answer to understand why this deal was made.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,342
Messages
27,073
Members
1,477
Latest member
Pr K Singh
Back
Top