SSS Defence CEO Criticizes Govt Decision to Acquire Foreign SIG 716i Rifles Despite Better Indigenous Alternatives Available

sss%20defence.jpg


New Delhi: The Indian government's recent decision to procure an additional 73,000 SIG 716 assault rifles from US manufacturer Sig Sauer Inc. has sparked intense debate. Vivek Krishnan, CEO of Bengaluru-based SSS Defence, expressed his frustration on social media, criticizing the government's ongoing preference for foreign-made weapons despite the much-touted "Make in India" initiative.

In a five-point post, Krishnan highlighted the difficulties faced by domestic defence manufacturers in competing with foreign companies, particularly when the government prioritizes imports over local production. He emphasized that SSS Defence, a company with a 70-year history and an emerging player in the Indian defence sector, has been diligently developing world-class small arms, yet these efforts seem overlooked.

Krishnan began his post by expressing disappointment with the government's decision, stating that a private solicitation with an emphasis on Indian design and content would have easily identified suitable domestic contenders. He questioned the seriousness of the "Make in India" initiative in the defence sector, pointing out hurdles faced by Indian manufacturers and stressing the need for greater support and patience to foster indigenous weapon development.

He further criticized the government, stating that the private sector is attempting to undo the damage inflicted by government-owned companies over the years in defence manufacturing. He challenged the Indian Army to test SSS Defence's rifles against global benchmarks and make the results public, as "real serious armies" do.

Krishnan's post triggered a debate, with several prominent journalists, ex-servicemen, commentators, and former bureaucrats voicing their opinions. Ravi Kumar Gupta, a former DRDO scientist and commentator, backed Krishnan and urged Indian decision-makers to take his challenge seriously. He emphasized the need to listen to industry voices and give due consideration to what Indian companies can produce domestically.

Gupta directly urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to address Krishnan's concerns, stressing the importance of comparing indigenously made weapons with those from other countries. He expressed hope that the Army would accept Krishnan's challenge honestly, overcoming the lure of imports and kickbacks.

This incident highlights the ongoing struggle faced by domestic defence manufacturers in India, even as the government promotes the "Make in India" initiative. It underscores the need for greater transparency and support for local companies to strengthen India's defence capabilities and reduce reliance on foreign imports.
 
Everyone gets a good chunk of gold from import that's the reason it's still considered better. Corruption is everywhere, defence is no exception.
 
It is quite important that government should support indigenous defence products specifically if they are equal to better than imported products. Now government should accept the challenge of Mr. Krishnan and Army should carryout trials with his company's guns and if they are better, government should cancel the order on foreign supplier and give the order to Indian company. As such we should not fully depend on USA as USA.is not trustworthy supplier which is visible in delay in supply of engines for LCA. In case of war, thee are more chances that USA will stop supply of critical arms and ammunition. India must be self sufficient in defence.
 
Govt acquired immediately because of inefficiency by Indian companies to procure which takes 2 years to provide this.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,547
Messages
37,847
Members
2,443
Latest member
Adess Singh
Back
Top