Rafale Maintains Record-Breaking 90% Operational Readiness for IAF, Emerges as Best Candidate for Further 114 Jet Procurement

Rafale Maintains Record-Breaking 90% Operational Readiness for IAF, Emerges as Best Candidate for Further 114 Jet Procurement


The Dassault Rafale has solidified its position as the premier choice for the Indian Air Force’s (IAF) pressing requirement for 114 multi-role fighter aircraft (MRFA).

This preference is largely driven by the fleet’s exceptional serviceability rate, which consistently hovers around 90 per cent.

This figure not only exceeds the IAF's internal benchmarks but also outperforms virtually every other frontline fighter in operation today, including the fifth-generation American F-35.

Availability as the Ultimate Combat Metric​

For Indian defence planners, the availability of an aircraft is as vital as its speed or weapon payload.

In a scenario involving a two-front threat, the true measure of air power is not the total number of aircraft on paper, but the number of jets that can be launched immediately for combat.

In this regard, the Rafale has proven to be the most reliable asset in the IAF’s inventory.

While most modern fighter fleets globally struggle to maintain serviceability rates between 60 and 75 per cent due to complex logistical needs and fragile avionics, the Rafale has normalised a 90 per cent readiness rate.

This reliability ensures that for every 10 Rafales in a squadron, nine are ready to fight at any given moment—a force multiplier that effectively increases the fleet's operational size.

Engineering for Rapid Turnaround​

The secret to this high availability lies in the Rafale’s "maintainability-first" design philosophy.

The aircraft utilises a modular architecture featuring Line-Replaceable Units (LRUs). These allow ground crews to quickly swap out faulty avionics or mission systems right on the flight line, avoiding the need for lengthy hangar repairs.

Furthermore, the maintenance ecosystem is supported by advanced predictive health monitoring. This system analyses data from the aircraft’s components to forecast potential failures before they occur, drastically reducing unscheduled downtime.

Unlike the American F-35, which relies on the complex and often troubled Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), the Rafale’s support system has proven to be robust and easier to manage in Indian operational conditions.

The F-35 Contrast​

The comparison with the Lockheed Martin F-35 is particularly revealing for defence analysts. While the F-35 offers unmatched stealth and sensor fusion, it remains plagued by maintenance bottlenecks.

Recent data indicates that the F-35 fleet often operates with mission-capable rates in the 50 to 60 per cent range, hampered by shortages of spare parts and software stability issues.

For the IAF, which requires a workhorse capable of sustaining high-tempo surge operations from high-altitude bases in Ladakh to the maritime theatre in the Indian Ocean, the Rafale’s proven maturity offers a distinct advantage over the developmental teething troubles still affecting the F-35 program.

Strategic Autonomy and Future Procurement​

The Rafale’s case for the 114-jet MRFA tender is further strengthened by India’s developing indigenous support structure.

With Dassault Aviation establishing a Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) facility in Hyderabad and committed to a significant "Make in India" component—potentially up to 80 per cent for new orders—the supply chain for spares is becoming increasingly localised.

Reports also suggest that a potential government-to-government deal for additional Rafales could include upgrades to the F4 standard and the eventual incorporation of the futuristic F5 variant.

This would ensure that the IAF not only maintains high availability today but also stays technologically relevant for decades to come.

Beyond mere availability, the Rafale continues to deliver as a true "omni-role" platform. It can execute air superiority, deep precision strikes with SCALP missiles, and nuclear deterrence missions without needing to be reconfigured.

This versatility, combined with rock-solid reliability, makes it the pragmatic frontrunner to form the backbone of India’s future air combat capability.
 
Don't compare apples to oranges. On 5th gen jets the MC rates are less because of complexity - LO maintenance demands constant attention, fault isolation and repair requires specialized personnel and engines and thermal management loads require very frequent replacement - to name a few.
 
There's no fault in rafale, the main bottleneck is the extent of source code we get, the timelines, the cost, the indigenization percent
 
Crux of the matter is, we need squadron strength. Rafale, is a capable fighter jet, yeah, its not a 5th gen fighter jet...but currently in all our conflicts, we use our jets to perform standoff strikes behind the capable shield of S400, Barak and Akash AD.
F35, as mentioned is extremely costly and its maintenance is even more of a headache. Su57 is a lucrative deal but Russian capability is under doldrums due to Ukraine war (we are already seeing delay in procuring our 5 S400 squadrons, whose order was given in 2018 itself).

Rafale was the diplomatic choice to

1. stay away from US influence
2. away from potential CAATSA
3. Away from delivery delays (Russia)
4. Operational knowhow (we are already operating Rafale)
5. Get the immediate help for IAF.
 
Crux of the matter is, we need squadron strength. Rafale, is a capable fighter jet, yeah, its not a 5th gen fighter jet...but currently in all our conflicts, we use our jets to perform standoff strikes behind the capable shield of S400, Barak and Akash AD.
F35, as mentioned is extremely costly and its maintenance is even more of a headache. Su57 is a lucrative deal but Russian capability is under doldrums due to Ukraine war (we are already seeing delay in procuring our 5 S400 squadrons, whose order was given in 2018 itself).

Rafale was the diplomatic choice to

1. stay away from US influence
2. away from potential CAATSA
3. Away from delivery delays (Russia)
4. Operational knowhow (we are already operating Rafale)
5. Get the immediate help for IAF.
F35 is less expensive than the Rafale deal we are purchasing
 
There's no fault in rafale, the main bottleneck is the extent of source code we get, the timelines, the cost, the indigenization percent
The serviceability rate of the Dassault Rafale fighter jet in service with the French Air Force is 48.5%, according to information given to a French lawmaker by the government. I don't know this news is just PR tool of big company or what.
 
The serviceability rate of the Dassault Rafale fighter jet in service with the French Air Force is 48.5%, according to information given to a French lawmaker by the government. I don't know this news is just PR tool of big company or what.
How is the serviceability rate of Indian and French rafales interconnected
 
F35 is less expensive than the Rafale deal we are purchasing
Flyaway cost, yes.

But when you consider maintenance and operational costs...F35 will shoot up like anything. F35 RAM coating is extremely expensive and requires specialized hangars for climatic conditions. Plus US maintains a strict control over software data...which France doesnt. Not sure if India has that much money.

Rafale also allows the integration with indigenous BVR...Astra can integrate with Rafale. There is huge uncertainty on F35 witg respect to our homegrown missile systems.

Also, one more key thing is S400, US will NEVER allow any kind of data sharing with Russian equipments (Turkey returning S400). France will make some noise but not like US.
 
Flyaway cost, yes.

But when you consider maintenance and operational costs...F35 will shoot up like anything. F35 RAM coating is extremely expensive and requires specialized hangars for climatic conditions. Plus US maintains a strict control over software data...which France doesnt.

Rafale also allows the integration with indigenous BVR...Astra can integrate with Rafale. Also, one more key thing is S400, US will NEVER allow any kind of data sharing with Russian equipments (Turkey returning S400). France will make some noise but not like US.
Yeah, and USAF F35 availablity rates were 50% only so for a considerable and war usable case you need to have atleast 150 F35 so that even 70-80 remain for immediate use , USA could deny the daily activation codes in wartime , much like they did in periscopes case during kargil war, you have to import every parts including stealth paints, so you have no option other than rafale
 
The serviceability rate of the Dassault Rafale fighter jet in service with the French Air Force is 48.5%, according to information given to a French lawmaker by the government. I don't know this news is just PR tool of big company or what.
That was a 2016 article....obsolete.
 
F35 is less expensive than the Rafale deal we are purchasing
Greetings from Germany.
The Luftwaffe's 35 F-35 fleet procurement will cost us €8.3bn. Add to that the additional costs to upgrade AFB Büchel- a US requirement- and the total cost is at least €10bn to stand up Tactical Fighter Squadron 33.
 
Greetings from Germany.
The Luftwaffe's 35 F-35 fleet procurement will cost us €8.3bn. Add to that the additional costs to upgrade AFB Büchel- a US requirement- and the total cost is at least €10bn to stand up Tactical Fighter Squadron 33.
I am talking about flyaway costs
 
No need to compare Rafale and F 35 as the latter is out of consideration. US has shown it's so much hyped democracy which one person Donald Duck has made mockery of it. So its wise to keep away from F 35. Already India has tasted it in getting 404 engine. SU 54 is the best option along with two squadrons of Rafale. Serviceability percentage isn't the only criteria of fighting wars. India needs fifth generation jets to counter China beside Pakistan.
 
US has proved time and again that it is a most unreliable partner so buying a frontline military platform from them would be disastrous. From the options available ( and maybe even including the F 35) the Rafale deal makes the most sense.
 
There's no fault in rafale, the main bottleneck is the extent of source code we get, the timelines, the cost, the indigenization percent
How can a jet that has very significant low performance than our Magnificent Sukhois that too on every parameter, speed, climb rate, operating ceiling, range, maneurability, payload and if cannot be armed with out Brahmos be the urgent need for IAF. It will be useless in our Himalayan borders. And if will need Sukhois to escort it on thd western borders. Going by the Mirage 2000 experiance the French airframes have high maintenance and short service life compared to Migs n Sukhois. Also unlime our Migs & Sukhois it has no protection against bird hits and needs "mirror finish" runway! Add to all these disadvantages is the humongous cost. To pay for these the army had to reduce our Jawans to Agniveer at no benefits,vow salary and short service. Hope good sense prevails. Jai Hind! Vande Mataram!
 
SU-57 with full tech.transfer is the best option for the future of India.
Absolutely right Sir! SU-57 Far ahead of its nearest rivals. And it has been used in actual combat against the air defence of the US Nato and all their allies. Heartening to know that are patriotic Indian who know about fighter jets exist. Jai Hind!
 
US has proved time and again that it is a most unreliable partner so buying a frontline military platform from them would be disastrous. From the options available ( and maybe even including the F 35) the Rafale deal makes the most sense.
You are right about US . Puny Rafale is a huge marketing & lobbying success. It does not even come close to our trusted Sukhois. So why pay such a huge price for a jet with such low specs? Jai Hind.
 
How can a jet that has very significant low performance than our Magnificent Sukhois that too on every parameter, speed, climb rate, operating ceiling, range, maneurability, payload and if cannot be armed with out Brahmos be the urgent need for IAF. It will be useless in our Himalayan borders. And if will need Sukhois to escort it on thd western borders. Going by the Mirage 2000 experiance the French airframes have high maintenance and short service life compared to Migs n Sukhois. Also unlime our Migs & Sukhois it has no protection against bird hits and needs "mirror finish" runway! Add to all these disadvantages is the humongous cost. To pay for these the army had to reduce our Jawans to Agniveer at no benefits,vow salary and short service. Hope good sense prevails. Jai Hind! Vande Mataram!
The IAF has operated the Mirage 2000 for about 40 years and will continue to do so for another 10 years. How many aircraft have been lost due to 'bird hits'?
 
Crux of the matter is, we need squadron strength. Rafale, is a capable fighter jet, yeah, its not a 5th gen fighter jet...but currently in all our conflicts, we use our jets to perform standoff strikes behind the capable shield of S400, Barak and Akash AD.
F35, as mentioned is extremely costly and its maintenance is even more of a headache. Su57 is a lucrative deal but Russian capability is under doldrums due to Ukraine war (we are already seeing delay in procuring our 5 S400 squadrons, whose order was given in 2018 itself).

Rafale was the diplomatic choice to

1. stay away from US influence
2. away from potential CAATSA
3. Away from delivery delays (Russia)
4. Operational knowhow (we are already operating Rafale)
5. Get the immediate help for IAF.
Well said brother.... Rafale is not exactly being chosen for its "next-gen" or "futuristic" tech that will be unrivaled for decades to come... But it is being chosen for a reliable fighter that iaf can put up on the sky whenever needed... F35's cost (not the buying cost but the obnoxious maintenance cost) makes it a burden when we already have good prospects with AMCA. Rafale is the workhorse (like su30 just in medium category), not some fancy stuff that proves to be situational high tech gear, much less useful for what iaf uses jets for.
 
You are right about US . Puny Rafale is a huge marketing & lobbying success. It does not even come close to our trusted Sukhois. So why pay such a huge price for a jet with such low specs? Jai Hind.
Sukhois need upgrade...thats why Super Sukhoi project is critical.
Problem is with the current squadron strength, we cant send Su30MKI for long repairs as they're the backbone of our Air force.

Su57 is a great deal, but Russian MIC capability is severely hampered by Ukraine war and sanctions. Russia is mostly producing the Soviet era war machines to continue their fighting capability. We might get sucked into another Tejas mk1a type situation with Russia, already we are seeing a huge delay in delivery of S400 squadrons.

With these concerns, its a necessity to get some other aircrafts which can give boost to our Airforce. Rafales (F4 & F5) also have capability of MUMT which Sukhoi dont have in their present form.
 
How can a jet that has very significant low performance than our Magnificent Sukhois that too on every parameter, speed, climb rate, operating ceiling, range, maneurability, payload and if cannot be armed with out Brahmos be the urgent need for IAF. It will be useless in our Himalayan borders. And if will need Sukhois to escort it on thd western borders. Going by the Mirage 2000 experiance the French airframes have high maintenance and short service life compared to Migs n Sukhois. Also unlime our Migs & Sukhois it has no protection against bird hits and needs "mirror finish" runway! Add to all these disadvantages is the humongous cost. To pay for these the army had to reduce our Jawans to Agniveer at no benefits,vow salary and short service. Hope good sense prevails. Jai Hind! Vande Mataram!
IAF rafales have a availability rate of 90% while Su30 mki (in 2024) had availability rates of less than 50% (it is also evident from the target of 70-80% under super Sukhoi), while Su30 mki exceeds in top speed but rafale has a climb rate of around 305 m/s while Su30 mki has 300m/s,

Sukhoi Su-30MKI:

Strengths:

Heavyweight fighter: The Su-30MKI is way heavier than the Dassault Rafale which allows it to carry a larger amount of payload compared to the Dassault Rafale.

Long-range capabilities: The Su-30MKI is way bigger than the Dassault Rafale, so it carries a good amount of fuel, which makes it a very long-range aircraft and more suitable for long-range operations covering large, vast areas.

High maneuverability: The Su-30MKI really dominates the Dassault Rafale on this parameter because Russian jets are known for their maneuvering capabilities because they have 360-degree thrust vectoring control technology, making it one of the best fighters in the world for dogfights.

Cost-effective: The Su-30MKI is far cheaper than the Dassault Rafale because they are Russian, and in both ways, be it for acquisition or for operation, it is cheaper than the Dassault Rafale.

Weakness:

Reliability and maintenance: The Indian Air Force has been trying very hard to constantly improve the Sukhoi Su-30MKI, but reliability has always been a point of concern for them, and it being a heavy- weight fighter jet has complex systems, making it a big challenge for the Indian Air Force to maintain it.
Avionics and sensors: Even after continuous upgrades and advancements, the Su-30MKI still lacks behind the Dassault Rafale in terms of avionics and sensors.

Limited stealth capabilities: The Su-30MKI is a heavy- weight fighter jet and a 4.5-generation fighter jet, which means it's very big in size, which in turn means that it has a significant amount of radar cross- section, making it easier for the enemies to radar lock it

Dassault Rafale:

Strengths:

Versatility: The Rafale is an amazing jet that is capable of performing all kinds of missions, including ground attacks, nuclear attacks, etc.

Advanced avionics: The Rafale is ahead of the Su- 30MKI in this parameter as it has many advanced features for electronic warfare, etc.

• Advanced weapons: One of the very big reasons for the Indian Air Force to procure the Dassault Rafale was because of the missile package that came with it, which had MBDA Meteor, MICA, etc.

Weaknesses:

Payload and range: If we compare it with the Su- 30MKI the Dassault Rafale has less range and payload.

Cost: One very big point of concern with the Rafale is the cost of it, it is very expensive to procure and maintain.

Size and agility: Compared to the Su-30MKI the Rafale is very less maneuverable and agile, and we all shouldn't forget that the Russian jets are known for their maneuverability and agility.

So summarising all these points, both are different aircrafts made for different role, one is for air superiority while other is for strike roles, so don't compare apples with oranges
 

Forum statistics

Threads
6,129
Messages
61,937
Members
4,830
Latest member
Hardik Choudhary
Back
Top