BEML Seeks Partner for New Wheeled Armoured Fighting Vehicle (WhAFV) and ATGM Development under Buy Indian-IDDM

Bharat Earth Movers Limited (BEML), a key public sector company operating under India's Ministry of Defence, has announced plans to develop a new Wheeled Armoured Fighting Vehicle (WhAFV) equipped with an Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) system.

The company is seeking partners for this joint development project, which falls under the government's Buy (Indian-Indigenously Designed, Developed, and Manufactured - IDDM) procurement category.

This initiative, detailed in an Expression of Interest (EoI) document (Ref: CTP&AM/EoI/SM/2025), supports India's goals of self-reliance ('Atmanirbhar Bharat') and domestic manufacturing ('Make in India') by aiming to provide the Indian Army with advanced defence systems made within the country.

The development comes as the Indian Army continues its efforts to modernize its equipment, replacing older vehicles and improving its ability to operate effectively in various conditions.

The planned WhAFV is expected to be an 8x8 wheeled vehicle designed for high mobility across different landscapes, including deserts and mountainous areas.

When combined with a modern ATGM system, this vehicle aims to give the Army a flexible and powerful tool to counter enemy tanks and fortified structures. This need is underscored by the ongoing security considerations along India's borders, such as the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and the Line of Control (LoC).

Procurement under the Buy (Indian-IDDM) category, established in the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016, gives preference to equipment that is designed, developed, and manufactured within India, requiring a minimum of 40% locally sourced content.

BEML's invitation for partnership is open to both Indian and international companies, seeking technology collaboration to meet these IDDM standards while incorporating global expertise.

BEML has a history of supplying essential defence equipment, such as High Mobility Vehicles, Armoured Recovery Vehicles, and specialized ground support vehicles for missile programs.

While specific technical details have not been finalised, the new WhAFV is anticipated to incorporate modern technology based on the Army's requirements and previous Requests for Information (RFIs), like the one issued in 2019 for similar vehicles. Key features are likely to include:

• Mobility: An 8x8 wheel configuration for excellent cross-country travel, independent suspension, adjustable tyre pressure (central tire inflation), and a powerful engine (estimated 600-700 hp) allowing speeds over 80 km/h on roads.
• Protection: Armour plating meeting STANAG Level 4 standards, specially designed seats to protect against blasts, and potentially an Active Protection System (APS) to intercept threats like missiles. Systems to counter drones and laser targeting are also expected.
• Firepower: A turret, possibly remotely operated, armed with a 30-40 mm main gun, a machine gun, and the ATGM launcher. The missile itself is expected to be a 'fire-and-forget' type with a range of 4-5 km, capable of attacking targets from the top or directly.
• Electronics: Advanced systems including Artificial Intelligence (AI) for battlefield management, real-time situational awareness linking various units, and drone integration. Night vision, GPS, and secure communications are standard requirements.

The ATGM system integrated into the vehicle might leverage technology from India's existing Man-Portable Anti-Tank Guided Missile (MPATGM), developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and produced by Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL).

The MPATGM is known for its 'fire-and-forget' capability, infrared seeker, 4 km range, and ability to strike tanks on their vulnerable top armour. Adapting such technology for the WhAFV would provide precise firepower against armoured threats.

BEML's search for partners aims to facilitate technology transfer and establish indigenous manufacturing capabilities for these advanced systems. This collaborative model is similar to strategies used in other major Indian defence projects, such as the Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV) and Future Ready Combat Vehicle (FRCV) programs, which have involved partnerships between Indian companies like Tata and Larsen & Toubro (L&T) and international defence firms.

This initiative represents another significant step in India's ongoing efforts to build a self-sufficient and modern defence industrial base.

 

IAF Favours Indigenous LCH Prachand to Replace Ageing Mi-35 Hind, Halting Additional Apache Imports

Opinion  Why Early International Partners Vital for AMCA Fighter Export Success, Mirroring South Korean KF-21's Successful Outreach to Gulf Nations

[ansu]

These are of little use in modern-day warfare as a swarm of drones can easily target them. Unless there is drone defence, these can be easily destroyed.

 

[Anonymus]

These are of little use in modern-day warfare as a swarm of drones can easily target them. Unless there is drone defence, these can be easily destroyed.

So basically, according to you, we should not buy tanks, infantry carriers, infantry combat vehicles, etc., as they will be sitting ducks for swarm drones. Then why even buy fighter jets? These are easy targets for SAMs. We don't need aircraft carriers as they will be easy targets for hyper and supersonic ASMs. We don't need subs as they can easily be targets for torpedoes.

This is not how defence equipment is procured. For every technology or weapon, counter weapons are required or present. Surely, swarm drone countermeasures are also being worked on, like Israel's Iron Beam, DRDO's DEW, US HELIOS, LAWS, and HELWS, EU's TALOS, etc.

 

[abhinav srivastava]

Why invite foreign firms when we have indegenous options.

 

[Radha Ramanan]

These are of little use in modern-day warfare as a swarm of drones can easily target them. Unless there is drone defence, these can be easily destroyed.

You're right... only mature, battle-hardened systems like the Israeli Trophy can be effective on any battlefield vehicle. Trying to put a desi or an untested APS will surely invite disaster. In spite of the Trophy APS, some Merkava tanks were hit due to very close firing ranges by Hamas. Also, there is no top attack protection by any APS today, and Israel is working on it. That's our best bet in my opinion.

 

[Leo red]

Tanks are now absolute. ATGM drones and short-range missiles, thermal IR night vision AI-powered detection, and beyond visual range attack will be the future. Before enemies come, they will be attacked non-stop by air weapons. Their tanks will be garbage while crossing borders. GPS and communication will be jammed. Mine dropper drones will block their advance. Artillery with drones will eliminate them, and whatever is left is then terminated by small guns. Low-cost weapons will keep war alive for years, as seen in the Ukraine war.

 

[Leo red]

Now we will require lots of infantry vehicles each holding jammer night vision IR ATGM small gus 20mm may be capable of targeting drones and helicopters tanks. Also movement of large forces should be avoided and small but fast action force needed to eliminate enemy establishment or assets before they react. Also accompanied by missiles launcher targeting heavy assets. Or backed by artillerys.

 

[Sandeep]

The most important aspect in developing a IFV is that you develop one which gives you a significant military advantage over your enemy. There’s no point if your just going to develop the same type as your enemy or that’s common around the world who will have a 30mm gun and you develop the same 30mm gun. That’s not an advantage.

You need superior firepower with at least a 40mm cannon, medium and heavy machine guns, automatic grenade launcher, ATGM, powerful and faster engine, automatic transmission, superior and thicker armour, additional add on armour, NERA, automatic target and tracking, night/thermal vision, SDR, advanced navigation system, APU, surveillance and loiter drones and active protection system etc

It’s great that more companies are trying to develop a wheeled armoured vehicle but BEML is a bit late as Tata and Mahindra have successfully developed the WHAP/Kestrel. Also you now have Kalyani developing their own version as well so it will be a very competitive competition which is good as now the military can decide on the best vehicle and at a lower competitive price.

 

[GMR]

These are of little use in modern-day warfare as a swarm of drones can easily target them. Unless there is drone defence, these can be easily destroyed.

So What's ur suggestion to armed forces of all countries, defend your countries only with drones & scrap Navy, Army & Airforce?

 

[GMR]

Good start, mounting ATGM is a good step. incorporate effective & robust anti drone systems.

 

[Akshat]

These are of little use in modern-day warfare as a swarm of drones can easily target them. Unless there is drone defence, these can be easily destroyed.

Everything can be targeted by something else in war. Drones can target tanks, artillery, other drones (before they take flight), and even our soldiers and generals. So basically we should disband the whole military?

 

[Akshat]

Why invite foreign firms when we have indegenous options.

Why invite them? Because we want an open market to the extent possible, and in some cases we won't know if the indigenous products can meet even the basic minimum criteria till the time of trials. But wherever indigenous options are present, they are given a massive advantage to the extent possible. Look at ATAGS. That gun is totally useless against China and can only be used in limited areas against Pakistan. It's ammo is different, training is different. It costs twice as much as the imported option. Yet despite all it's deficiencies, that gun has been inducted albeit in a reduced quantity. Even if we can only use it as a museum art.

 

[abhinav srivastava]

Why invite them? Because we want an open market to the extent possible, and in some cases we won't know if the indigenous products can meet even the basic minimum criteria till the time of trials. But wherever indigenous options are present, they are given a massive advantage to the extent possible. Look at ATAGS. That gun is totally useless against China and can only be used in limited areas against Pakistan. It's ammo is different, training is different. It costs twice as much as the imported option. Yet despite all it's deficiencies, that gun has been inducted albeit in a reduced quantity. Even if we can only use it as a museum art.

We only want open market where we lag technology. Check out recent podcast from Maj. Gen. GD Bakshi. He answered all your questions.

 

[Akshat]

We only want open market where we lag technology. Check out recent podcast from Maj. Gen. GD Bakshi. He answered all your questions.

Exactly. We have an open market, but in areas where we have the tech, the Indian product is selected. That's precisely what I said. But before the trials, how can you confirm if we lag technology or not?

And if we are talking about podcasts, also see the one where ATAGS was badly bashed by the former Artillery chief of IA on The Print (forgetting his name). So having such junk technology at twice the price is also not a great thing.

 

[abhinav srivastava]

Exactly. We have an open market, but in areas where we have the tech, the Indian product is selected. That's precisely what I said. But before the trials, how can you confirm if we lag technology or not?

And if we are talking about podcasts, also see the one where ATAGS was badly bashed by the former Artillery chief of IA on The Print (forgetting his name). So having such junk technology at twice the price is also not a great thing.

This is twitter link

https://twitter.com/x/status/1904233028169388130

Will be happy to watch if any relevant interviews you can share. BTW we all know our forces procurement process works on lot of other factors. The gun proved its mettle in 2016.