IAF Streamlining Fighter Jet Fleet for Enhanced Efficiency, Aims All-Indigenous by 2070

The Indian Air Force (IAF) is embarking on an ambitious transformation, set to revolutionize its fleet and bolster its domestic aerospace capabilities.

Over the next two decades, the IAF plans to streamline its diverse fleet, phasing out older models like the MiG-21 and Mirage-2000. These will be replaced by a core group of five fighter jets, with a heavy emphasis on domestically produced aircraft.

The Tejas MkII and Mk1A, both developed in India, are expected to become the backbone of the IAF, making up approximately 50% of the future fleet. This move not only simplifies logistics and training but also signals a significant step towards self-reliance in defense production.

Adding to this domestic dominance, the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), a 5th generation fighter jet currently under development, is slated to join the ranks by 2040. With the AMCA, the IAF projects that nearly 60% of its fighter jets will be made in India.

While the Tejas and AMCA take center stage, the Rafale and Su-30MKI will continue to play crucial roles, remaining operational until at least 2070. Their eventual replacements are envisioned to be part of the next generation of Indian-made fighter jets.

The IAF's long-term vision extends even further, with the goal of achieving a 100% indigenous fighter jet fleet by 2070-80. This ambitious target underscores India's growing prowess in aerospace engineering and its commitment to self-sufficiency in defense.

This transformative plan is a testament to the IAF's determination to modernize and strengthen its capabilities, ensuring its position as a formidable force in the skies for decades to come.

 

[Akshat]

and cancel MRFA.

Not gonna happen

 

[Akshat]

SU-30 upgrade with twin Izdelie-30 engines.

IAF is not interested.

 

[Pink Panther]

Hal will take 100 years to supply those. So either sell HAL off or buy MRFA planes.

Means Dassault will also take that many years, both companies make 6/year.

 

[Sandeep]

How dum are you? Pakistan or China can't attack India at all because we have nuclear weapons which can destroy their entire country.

arent you aware that india has a no first use policy. And india being the first one to use nukes against pakistan will be an absolute humiliation. It would mean admitting india cant beat pakistan in a fair fight.

 

[Philippe Picard]

Means Dassault will also take that many years, both companies make 6/year.

both companies make 6/year? What is your source?

 

[abhinav srivastava]

Their defense budget dwarfs that of India's. Whereas, most of our defense budget are likely ending up as pensioners & salaries, etc.

Difference is in outlook and priorities. They also have invested ~24 billion USD for Semiconductor chip and machinery R&D. Similar budget is now allocated for next 4-5 years. While we are busy in importing and renaming.

 

[Akshat]

Means Dassault will also take that many years, both companies make 6/year.

They delivered at 11 per year to India alone. But of course a self declared Indophobe won’t remember that.

 

[Sic Dalalard]

Hal will take 100 years to supply those. So either sell HAL off or buy MRFA planes.

Dassault took 6 years to supply 36 Rafales, What is 36/6, so they can only make 6/yr for export.

 

[పవన్కుమార్]

These fighter jet tejas and tejas mk2 service is enough for 2050 . AMCA service enough for 2055. Stealth 6th gen ( super Stealth Tejas , Super Stealth Tejas mk2 ) and Super Stealth AMCA mk2- mk3 is enough for service upto 2070 . That would carter sufficient service of stealth fighter jets to IAF ( Bharath Airforce )

 

[SK]

I hope the GoI doesn’t put any such force on our forces. Inducting different types of planes, which the forces themselves don’t want or need, will create massive logistics leakages. Better to make them buy whatever they need in larger numbers.

As for DPSUs, remember that the forces do buy armored vehicles, drones etc. from the private sector when DRDO is not involved. The problem comes when DRDO interferes and ruins the product. Even then our forces make massive concessions and buy products at super inflated prices.

Please share the incidents when DRDO has deliberately hampered any project.

DRDO & similar organizations have been participating with Indian Pvt sector.

Indian Military is the one that isn't clear with the technologies & Indigenous limitations such as Opting for 5.56X45 calibre when India wasn't sharing Good relationship with the West or Requesting for a 120mm rifled 4-Men MBT but then Opting for 125mm Smooth bore 3 Men crew MBTs.

Indian Military wasn't ready for CDS but then Indian Govt insured implementation of CDS by forcing the Military to modernize their ways.

If Indian Military was that good in long term decision making & boosting Indigenous technological base then India won't be struggling with Small Arms.

The reason India's ICBM, Space & Nuclear programs are able to become a success are due to direct supervision from PMO.

I hope that Indian-Govt will make give Aircraft & Marine Engine development the same importance as ICBMs.

 

[Sandeep]

arent you aware that india has a no first use policy. And india being the first one to use nukes against pakistan will be an absolute humiliation. It would mean admitting india cant beat pakistan in a fair fight.

Against Pakistan we can definitely beat them in a conventional war. The nuke option is more useful against China.

As for the no first use concept that is only a phrase that sounds good to foreign countries and on paper. At the end of the day in war your either winning and if not then your losing and when your losing your not going to get a second chance of keeping the country safe and hold onto power.

 

[Sandeep]

A surprise quick attack can let us lose significant amounts of land. Then if we threaten to use nukes, Us etc. will ask us both to do a ceasefire, making us lose land. If we don’t threaten, we will keep losing land. So doing a significant invasion without the use of nukes is highly possible.

China can’t launch a surprise attack now as it lost its advantage when they tried and lost in Galwan. We have dug in very well now with a significant amount of preparation done to stop that from ever happening with major infrastructure projects, upgrades, more hardened bunkers, roads, tunnels, ammunition, missiles, more bases, drones, air surveillance, satellite imagery etc.

Just because the USA might ask for a ceasefire it doesn’t mean that we have to agree to it. Look at Israel and its constant refusal to accept a ceasefire from Hamas which the USA has put a lot of pressure on. We have enough defence coverage but what we need is offensive fire power. We need at least another 4 permanent strike corps on the LAC backed by ITBP which will give us more advantage.