India Gears Up to Build Four 13,000-Ton S5-Class SSBNs with an Expected Cost of $2.4 Billion Per Sub Following Success of S4* SSBN

US_Navy_030814-N-0000X-003_Illustration_of_USS_Ohio_%28SSGN_726%29_which_is_undergoing_a_conversion_from_a_Ballistic_Missile_Submarine_%28SSBN%29_to_a_Guided_Missile_Submarine_%28SSGN%29_designation.jpg


Following the successful launch of the S4* nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), India is forging ahead with ambitious plans to develop a fleet of even larger and more advanced submarines. The new S5-class SSBNs, designed to be twice the size of their predecessors, represent a significant leap forward in India's naval capabilities and nuclear deterrence strategy.

The S5 submarines, with an estimated submerged displacement of 13,000 tons, will dwarf the existing Arihant-class and S4-class submarines. This increased size will allow for advanced nuclear propulsion systems, enhanced stealth features, and a larger payload of submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), significantly bolstering India's second-strike capability.

Initially envisioned as a six-submarine program, the Indian Navy is now likely to procure four S5 SSBNs, built in pairs across two phases. This phased approach allows for efficient resource management and gradual expansion of the fleet.

With the design phase already complete, each submarine is estimated to cost around ₹20,000 crores (approximately $2.4 billion). Given the strategic importance and financial commitment, the program will be directly overseen by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO).

This high-level oversight highlights the critical role the S5 program plays in India's national security strategy, especially in the context of growing geopolitical complexities in the Indo-Pacific region. The PMO's involvement will ensure dedicated funding and strict adherence to project timelines.

To facilitate the construction of these massive submarines, Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) is undergoing major infrastructure upgrades, particularly to its dry docks. These upgrades are crucial to accommodate the size and complexity of the S5 submarines.

The S5 program will leverage technological advancements from India's parallel Project-77, which focuses on developing nuclear attack submarines (SSNs). Both programs will utilize a new 190 MW pressurized water reactor (PWR) for propulsion, a significant upgrade from the reactors used in the Arihant-class. Additionally, both submarine classes will feature pump-jet propulsion, a quieter and more efficient system that enhances stealth capabilities.

The S5 SSBNs are a cornerstone of India's nuclear triad, which includes land-based missiles and aircraft-delivered nuclear weapons. This triad ensures a credible second-strike capability, vital for national security. With their extended range and advanced capabilities, the S5 submarines will significantly enhance India's deterrence posture in the face of increasing regional challenges.

By operating silently and securely in the depths of the ocean, the S5 submarines will guarantee India's ability to retaliate in the event of a nuclear attack. This sea-based leg of the nuclear triad is crucial for national security, and the S5 program ensures that India will maintain a robust and reliable second-strike capability for decades to come.
 
Even Four is not bad instead of 6 SSBN of 13000 Ton Given the cost 20,000 crore, Good to know that both Two SSN & Four SSBN of 13000 Ton class will b built parallel , another Good thing is 190 MW pressurized water reactor & pump jet prop Tech that will make stealthy apart from powerful , amazing Great project both , In Future more Addition of SSN likely to b seen . at starting only two SSN will built but after gain Expertise & building eco-system 6 SSN are not ruled out by then Economy will also b stronger than today
 
Excellent IN 👍👍. Along with these, conventional subs r also the need of time. Focus should not waiver from P75I..
 
Excellent IN 👍👍. Along with these, conventional subs r also the need of time. Focus should not waiver from P75I..
Thats why Follow-on of Three kalvari class with Indigenous AIP apart from P-75I is going to signed the deal plus Indigenous 12 conventional subs are going to built
 
Do we really have SSN tech?? I mean its the top secret tech which the west world have guarded … did our scientists successfully developed this tech??
 
Hopefully the nuclear rector for the next Two SSBNs will be upgraded to 220-230 MW and further to 250 MW with 5th gen technology 95% refined uranium with lifetime run of the subs of over 35 years . The same 250 MW two reactors can then be used on the supercarriers planned to be built during 2030 -2045 .
 
Do we really have SSN tech?? I mean its the top secret tech which the west world have guarded … did our scientists successfully developed this tech??
It’s not one tech but a lot of different technologies. We have some of it, we have received some as ToT from conventional subs like Scorpene, and we will develop some. It will still be inferior to western subs for the time being but we can improve with time. Also, France is ready to share most of it, except the nuclear aspects. So some help can come from there.
 
Hopefully the nuclear rector for the next Two SSBNs will be upgraded to 220-230 MW and further to 250 MW with 5th gen technology 95% refined uranium with lifetime run of the subs of over 35 years . The same 250 MW two reactors can then be used on the supercarriers planned to be built during 2030 -2045 .
You seems to be dreaming on many counts without really knowing the facts and reality. Using 95% enriched (you have used refined term, refine and enrichment are totally different) uranium for core of submarines reactor is possible but requires lot of technological developments, especially in metallurgy. The fuel cladding has to withstand normal corrosion and erosion for entire life of the boat, the total neutron and gamma dose it has to withstand is much higher, the internal fission gas pressure it has to withstand is much higher. These are only few aspects related to fuel cladding. There are many more related to reactor physics, burnable poisons etc. India has a long way to go in developing these technologies. The design of propulsion reactor for submarines and carrier, though quite similar in many ways, differs significantly as the one on carrier has much less design constraints compared to one on submarines.
 
You seems to be dreaming on many counts without really knowing the facts and reality. Using 95% enriched (you have used refined term, refine and enrichment are totally different) uranium for core of submarines reactor is possible but requires lot of technological developments, especially in metallurgy. The fuel cladding has to withstand normal corrosion and erosion for entire life of the boat, the total neutron and gamma dose it has to withstand is much higher, the internal fission gas pressure it has to withstand is much higher. These are only few aspects related to fuel cladding. There are many more related to reactor physics, burnable poisons etc. India has a long way to go in developing these technologies. The design of propulsion reactor for submarines and carrier, though quite similar in many ways, differs significantly as the one on carrier has much less design constraints compared to one on submarines.
But India is building the SSN anyway. Does it not imply that India has mastered these technologies?
 
But India is building the SSN anyway. Does it not imply that India has mastered these technologies?
It doesn’t. What it means that India has a design and might have mastered some of the tech, with the rest coming up. And not all of them might be at the same level as the west, at the bleeding edge. Some of the tech might be of the 60s or 90s vintage as well. But this is a start.
 
It doesn’t. What it means that India has a design and might have mastered some of the tech, with the rest coming up. And not all of them might be at the same level as the west, at the bleeding edge. Some of the tech might be of the 60s or 90s vintage as well. But this is a start.
When you are not sure which technology India has mastered and which it has not, then how could you be presume that it might be of 1960s?
 
S5s built at CSL - really, as compared to the SBC at Vizag! Anyone has more insights on this or this is just speculation?
 
Even Four is not bad instead of 6 SSBN of 13000 Ton Given the cost 20,000 crore, Good to know that both Two SSN & Four SSBN of 13000 Ton class will b built parallel , another Good thing is 190 MW pressurized water reactor & pump jet prop Tech that will make stealthy apart from powerful , amazing Great project both , In Future more Addition of SSN likely to b seen . at starting only two SSN will built but after gain Expertise & building eco-system 6 SSN are not ruled out by then Economy will also b stronger than today
Original plan was for 3 S5 SSBN. Even 3 S5 and 5 Arihant Class is a formidable second strike capability and can reliably hit China and Pakistan if they do any misadventure.
 
PMO should also take AMCA under it. It is even more strategic than S5 subs
Beg to disagree. AMCA is extremely important but is it as important as nuclear strike capability? Some may say AMCA is more important as it has a higher probability of being used rather than SSBN which will likely (and hopefully) never be used, but it must be remembered that SSBNs are never used specifically because of their very existence!

Nevertheless AMCA should be brought under PMO SPV initiative.
 
Do we really have SSN tech?? I mean its the top secret tech which the west world have guarded … did our scientists successfully developed this tech??
We can build an SSN right now by 2030, but of course it will be nowhere near capability of western or Russian SSNs. We have SSN tech, but what India needs is far more advanced SSN tech with pump jet and stealth features for which we need Russian and French assistance.
 
It’s not one tech but a lot of different technologies. We have some of it, we have received some as ToT from conventional subs like Scorpene, and we will develop some. It will still be inferior to western subs for the time being but we can improve with time. Also, France is ready to share most of it, except the nuclear aspects. So some help can come from there.
We can probably develop a 190 MW reactor by ourselves so realistically we only need pump jet and also other stealth acoustic methods from French.
 
13000 tons submarine ..bigger than almost all ships india has ever built except for aircraft carriers !!
 
When you are not sure which technology India has mastered and which it has not, then how could you be presume that it might be of 1960s?
I said 1960s, 1990s etc. That was the time these subs first came around. Approximately. So I am saying we might be at the first generation level in some, second in some and so on and so forth. I am not making any concrete claims here.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,103
Messages
30,449
Members
1,783
Latest member
Chandrashekhar Panda
Back
Top