Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) News and Discussion

U sure about that!?

First of all, if MRFA conclude then DRAL will be responsible as they would be locally manufactured.

Secondly, just what makes u think dominant fighters like F15 whose EX 2 is already here would be irrelevant in near future, given the world's strongest airforce is looking forward for their service atleast till 2060

Have u ever seen a stealth aircraft getting mass produced!?

F22 could not even cross the 200 mark and u want to operate so much numbers
F21, F15 are already 50 years old design and are very easy to track down due to very large RCS. Mig 35 is dead. Grippen is nothing better than Tejas. Rafale fighters will not be ready very soon due to supply constraints.

That only left Indegenous fighters.
 
Needs of MRFA:
  • pvt. company must and shall arise as an alternative to HAL, MRFA is a way to get pvt. sector involved in such manufacturing.
    Sol.n: either gov. manages to arrange a pvt. sector to manufacture Tejas mk2 or Pvt Sector must take the lead..... Ooopppsss !!ye kya puch liya Maine!?
  • to sustain effective no. of squadrons : It will take LCA mk2 2-3 years to become a mature platform, Rafales would be ready to fight platform.
In any case, MRFA is still a need.
AMCA mk1 is not the answer of MRFA. AMCA must be inducted in limited numbers. 7 sq. are more than enough.

LCA mk2 can replace MRFA if it is fast- tracked...Ooopppsss!! Yeh kya puch lia Maine

If MRFA _fails _to conclude before 2026, then it must and shall be cancelled, and pvt sector shall be heavily outsourced for part manufacturing of LCA mk2
By 2040, India needs:-
  1. 7 squadrons of MRFA (114 Rafale ofc, production in India)
  2. 12 squadrons of Tejas Mk 2 (240 units at least, to replace MiG 29, Jaguar, Mirage 2000)
  3. 10 squadros of Tejas Mk 1A (220 units; already on order)
  4. 3 squadrons of AMCA Mk 1 (60 units)
And along with 2 Rafale and 10 Su 30 MKI squadrons already in service, IAF can reach 44 squadron strength.
Later Su 30 maybe replaced by AMCA Mk 2 (by 2045)
 
F21, F15 are already 50 years old design and are very easy to track down due to very large RCS. Mig 35 is dead. Grippen is nothing better than Tejas. Rafale fighters will not be ready very soon due to supply constraints.

That only left Indegenous fighters.
Rafales are to be produced in India under MRFA🤦.

U think u r smarter than decision makers of the world's strongest force!?

They are looking forward for F15 service till 2060.
 
Both MRFA and AMCA should be on the table. In case of AMCA being delayed due to unavoidable reasons then MRFA can be used to stop depleting SQ of IAF.
 
By 2040, India needs:-
  1. 7 squadrons of MRFA (114 Rafale ofc, production in India)
  2. 12 squadrons of Tejas Mk 2 (240 units at least, to replace MiG 29, Jaguar, Mirage 2000)
  3. 10 squadros of Tejas Mk 1A (220 units; already on order)
  4. 3 squadrons of AMCA Mk 1 (60 units)
And along with 2 Rafale and 10 Su 30 MKI squadrons already in service, IAF can reach 44 squadron strength.
Later Su 30 maybe replaced by AMCA Mk 2 (by 2045)
2 sq. of AMCA mk1

AMCA can't replace Su 30. Su 30 is a multirole fighter ; AMCA is dedicated for CAS,SEAD and DEAD.

Su 30 must be replaced by Tejas mk2 ( advanced engine) or ORCA.

AMCA mk2 would be ur F22. Limited but lethal
 
No need of MRFA as within the same timeline, AMCA will be ready. Rafale will not be available before 2030 if we give orders now. F15, F21, MIG 35, GRIPPEN are already outdated by present technology standards.
What if AMCA is delayed further? It is difficult to trust Indian public sector.... Because of tarikh pe tarikh.
 
By 2040, India needs:-
  1. 7 squadrons of MRFA (114 Rafale ofc, production in India)
  2. 12 squadrons of Tejas Mk 2 (240 units at least, to replace MiG 29, Jaguar, Mirage 2000)
  3. 10 squadros of Tejas Mk 1A (220 units; already on order)
  4. 3 squadrons of AMCA Mk 1 (60 units)
And along with 2 Rafale and 10 Su 30 MKI squadrons already in service, IAF can reach 44 squadron strength.
Later Su 30 maybe replaced by AMCA Mk 2 (by 2045)
No
By 2040 IAF should have..

200 TEJAS MK1
200+TEJAS MK2
36 Rafale
280 Su 30
100 AMCA

45 Squadrans

More than enough

No need for MRFA
 
My solution.... Search for 2nd engine for MK1A ( may be RD-93 or our own Kaveri- but for that full fund sanction for Kaveri including test facility and flying test bed).. increase next order from 97 to 150.. convince a pvt sector to manufacture around 80-90 aircraft... Tell them half of mk2 order will be manufactured there also.. and half of AMCA and TEDBF order also... If not full as SPV model... No mmrca this is the best solution...
 
We can buy 400 Tejas mk2 at the price of MRFA
Quite surprised to know that u already know the per unit price of LCA mk2.....ab to gussa ho jaega ve*ya bola to.

MRFA will be locally manufactured and would be much cheaper, not just that imp. thing is pvt. sector involvement.

One more thing: LCA mk2 ki bhi koi aukat hai, 114 fighters me tu 400 LCA nhi kharid sakta , MWF kaha se kharidega!?
 
Total nonsense

NO NEED FOR MRFA

NO NEED FOR PHOREN MAAL

200 TEJAS MK1 AND

200 TEJAS MK2 IS ENOUGh
Explain production schedules and the balance production and retirement of older squadrons on a year-by-year basis. Go ahead, I'll wait.

It's easy to say we shouldn't import, but the numbers mandate it, whether you like it or not.

Here's a brief of my analysis:

As of 2024, we have 33 fighter squadrons. That will fall to 31 by 2025 with the retirement of the MiG-21. Assuming that HAL can hit 9 aircraft a year by 2027-28 (a very optimistic assumption) that will allow you to bring in a new squadron by 2027-28, and one new squadron every second year thereafter. That means that by 2035-36, we would have 36 squadrons. At that point, the Mirage 2000, Jaguar, and MiG-29s will be due for replacement, which (as of today) is some 14 squadrons. Even if you assume HAL can manufacture 9 Tejas Mk 2s a year by 2035-36 (again, overly optimistic), you can now add a full squadron equivalent a year. Even with this and committed orders (and with the upcoming retirement of older Su-30MKIs), the IAF won't actually reach 42 squadrons (even with AMCA, since the Tejas Mk 1 line will also end at some point) until the second half of the 2040s.

Oh, and all of that is on the assumption that everything goes right. If there were to be delays in induction of the Tejas Mk II or AMCA, or if HAL were to face delays in scaling up production, you can push that date into the 2050s, when the bulk of the Su-30MKI fleet will be approaching the end of its life.

Now, tell me this: Are you willing to risk India's defence for that long? Need it also be added that the 42 squadron requirement is outdated, and with both China and Pakistan increasing the sizes of their services, the required number has actually risen, and is now estimated to be around 45-51 squadrons?
 
By 2040, India needs:-
  1. 7 squadrons of MRFA (114 Rafale ofc, production in India)
  2. 12 squadrons of Tejas Mk 2 (240 units at least, to replace MiG 29, Jaguar, Mirage 2000)
  3. 10 squadros of Tejas Mk 1A (220 units; already on order)
  4. 3 squadrons of AMCA Mk 1 (60 units)
And along with 2 Rafale and 10 Su 30 MKI squadrons already in service, IAF can reach 44 squadron strength.
Later Su 30 maybe replaced by AMCA Mk 2 (by 2045)
I would say we would have 8 MRFA squadrons (150 aircraft in total including the Rafales), 13-15 Tejas Mk 2 squadrons, 10-13 Tejas Mk I/IA squadrons, and some 5-8 (minimum) squadrons of AMCA, with some of the newer Su-30MKI squadrons (say, 6-8 squadrons) still in service by 2044-45 (2 decades from now). That will make for between 42 and 52 squadrons in service. It has been identified some time back that the 42 squadron target itself is somewhat outdated, and may need to be increased.
 
No
By 2040 IAF should have..

200 TEJAS MK1
200+TEJAS MK2
36 Rafale
280 Su 30
100 AMCA

45 Squadrans

More than enough

No need for MRFA
Do you seriously believe that HAL, an organization that has proven utterly incapable of producing more than 4-5 aircraft a year, can manufacture over 500 jets in 15 years? Even more so when some 300 or so are of types that still do not exist. You really need a reality check, don't you?
 
Do you seriously believe that HAL, an organization that has proven utterly incapable of producing more than 4-5 aircraft a year, can manufacture over 500 jets in 15 years? Even more so when some 300 or so are of types that still do not exist. You really need a reality check, don't you?
I hate Hal... Everyone knows...

Production can be given to Adani or LT or TATA

60:40 ratio(L1:L2)

By 2028,
80 jets per year production possible (20 HAL+30 L1+ 30 L2)

Even 60 per year is enough

Tata Lt Adani.. All They do is screw driving anyway..
 
F21, F15 are already 50 years old design and are very easy to track down due to very large RCS. Mig 35 is dead. Grippen is nothing better than Tejas. Rafale fighters will not be ready very soon due to supply constraints.

That only left Indegenous fighters.
IF F21, F15 are outdated designs, then what does it make our Tejas for it lacks the network-centric data fusion? And maybe you are unaware, Gripen E/NG possesses the most advanced datalink networking system and has far better sensor fusion as compared to Tejas. Yes Rafale fighters cannot be supplied soon, based on current production capacity. That's why the French are seeking a lumpsum order for Rafale fighters so that they can shift some part of the production to India.
 
Quite surprised to know that u already know the per unit price of LCA mk2.....ab to gussa ho jaega ve*ya bola to.

MRFA will be locally manufactured and would be much cheaper, not just that imp. thing is pvt. sector involvement.

One more thing: LCA mk2 ki bhi koi aukat hai, 114 fighters me tu 400 LCA nhi kharid sakta , MWF kaha se kharidega!?
MRFA will not be lacally fanufactered, it will be screw driving by importing all the parts

Re tard mk2 is not MWF

Price of 400 mk2 will be 70 million at best. Due to mass manufacturing can be lowered rl 60 million..
 
It's more sensible for Indian Govt to consider investing in:-
  1. Additional 18 to 36 Rafale jets for IAF
  2. Encourage a JV b/w IAF & IN for TEDBF (ORCA) & AMCA
It makes No sense for IAF & IN to not to establish a JV to invest in TEDBF (ORCA) & AMCA programs.

Logistical synergy & Economy of Scales are the most important factor when investing in such long term Strategic projects.
 
My 2 cents:
  1. 72 Rafale gog, make in India (along with naval variants) with MRO. By the time mrfa process finishes, will be too late.
  2. 36 SU57 (i doubt we will get any other 5th gen) if it is logistically and geopolitically feasible to keep parity with China.
 
Explain production schedules and the balance production and retirement of older squadrons on a year-by-year basis. Go ahead, I'll wait.
I have already explained the production timeline in previous reply

Now come to MRFA

Even if India sign MRFA this year (which is not possible)

The delivery of Rafale will start from 2029 at best given large orders of Rafale

Assuming 10 Rafale per year from DRAL(again at best case) it Wil take at least 11 years(2040) to complete order...

Why waste so much money(around 25-30 billion)?? If we order Tejas mk2 instead and start production from 2030 then by 2040 we will have 400 Tejas mk2 if we give private sector production tender to Adani or TATA or LT...

20 mk2 jets per year by hal and rest by private production

Involve two private companies.
60:40 ratio between L1 and L2

80 jets per yaer(20 HAL+30 L1 +30L2)

Very much possible if M0di uses his brain..

Also we will get 400 Tejas mk2 at the price of MRFA.
 
MRFA will not be lacally fanufactered, it will be screw driving by importing all the parts

Re tard mk2 is not MWF

Price of 400 mk2 will be 70 million at best. Due to mass manufacturing can be lowered rl 60 million..
Ur indigenous LCA after 23 years of flight is not 65% indigenous while a Screwdriving product Su30mki will soon have almost 80% indigenised....what is more indigenous!?

Ur indigenous LCA is not even 60+ indigenous and then u have MRFA for whom it's a must to be atleast 50% indigenous 👏👏

Naam pe Jaa mat ...kaam pe jaa....
LCA AF mk2 was named MWF first but it was still lighter acc. to our IAF.

The world considers Gripen E as an MRFA, but for IAF it's an LCA...Gripen E ( not to be confused with Gripen C) and Tejas mk2 is of the same class. They are medium weight fighters .

Abe konsa Nasha kar liya!?
F15 ki unit cost 80 million hai , LCA mk1a ki unit cost 63 million hai aur tujhe 400 MWF 70 million me mil jayega!?

Abe nashedi, kya Sungh liya tine
 
Lol ! debate ?? Only the author thinks so. For anyone with common sense, it is cleat that even today AMCA is no more than a fantasy. MRFA is absolutely necessary if India is serious about its security!
When all the engineer drawings, testing and technology development of AMCA made like bulkheads, and so on why you have doubts about it.
 
My solution.... Search for 2nd engine for MK1A ( may be RD-93 or our own Kaveri- but for that full fund sanction for Kaveri including test facility and flying test bed).. increase next order from 97 to 150.. convince a pvt sector to manufacture around 80-90 aircraft... Tell them half of mk2 order will be manufactured there also.. and half of AMCA and TEDBF order also... If not full as SPV model... No mmrca this is the best solution...
If kaveri was successful we would not need anything...

Everything would be so easy
 
MRFA will not be lacally fanufactered, it will be screw driving by importing all the parts

Re tard mk2 is not MWF

Price of 400 mk2 will be 70 million at best. Due to mass manufacturing can be lowered rl 60 million..
WOW! 400 mk2 will be 70 million @ best. You are saying real planes right & not models?
 
Forget about indigenous aircrafts, immediately place orders for of the shelf fighter jets which ever is available, must be 4+ generation, at least fill the requirements of 42 squadrons ASAP with indigenous as well as foreign jets. The Chinese have fired a fresh warning claiming Arunachal Pradesh as its own territories. They're going to come anytime, must be prepared to meet them head on. Meanwhile you all can debate MRFA, AMCA, TED.., AK1, AK2 and what not for decades.
 
Needs of MRFA:
  • pvt. company must and shall arise as an alternative to HAL, MRFA is a way to get pvt. sector involved in such manufacturing.
    Sol.n: either gov. manages to arrange a pvt. sector to manufacture Tejas mk2 or Pvt Sector must take the lead..... Ooopppsss !!ye kya puch liya Maine!?
  • to sustain effective no. of squadrons : It will take LCA mk2 2-3 years to become a mature platform, Rafales would be ready to fight platform.
In any case, MRFA is still a need.
AMCA mk1 is not the answer of MRFA. AMCA must be inducted in limited numbers. 7 sq. are more than enough.

LCA mk2 can replace MRFA if it is fast- tracked...Ooopppsss!! Yeh kya puch lia Maine

If MRFA _fails _to conclude before 2026, then it must and shall be cancelled, and pvt sector shall be heavily outsourced for part manufacturing of LCA mk2
If MRFA is given approval today it will take minimum 5 years for production line to setup in India and to start making aircraft. And the number of aircraft manufacturedd per year will be <10. If we invest that money to ramp up production of tejas mk 2 and improve development of TEDBF and AMCA, we can get much better research. The money saved is immense. Remember, out of any money spent on defence industry in India, 30-40% comes back to govt as tax revenue.
 
Do you seriously believe that HAL, an organization that has proven utterly incapable of producing more than 4-5 aircraft a year, can manufacture over 500 jets in 15 years? Even more so when some 300 or so are of types that still do not exist. You really need a reality check, don't you?
The problem with domestic defence industry until now has been that the govts have been hesitant to invest. But in past 5 years a lot of work has been done. HAL has adopted modern production methods and new factories and production lines have been set up. Same is the case with the shipbuilders.
 
What exactly is there to debate? Unless HAL can somehow magically start producing 40 or so aircraft a year, MRFA is needed to ensure the IAF doesn't fall below a critically low strength and doesn't have a MiG-21 saga part 2.
If we were to give approval to MRFA today (which is not happening, i believe 1 year is needed to go through all steps) time needded for domestic production line to setup and start manufacturing will be >5 years. If we spent the same amount of money on Tejas Mk2 and TEDBF, we can produce much greater number of aircraft and give orders for much more indigenous missiles radars etc. Otherwise all of that will be imported. And remember that any amount spent on orders for indigenous equipment, govt gets back 30-40 percent back as tax revenue.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,506
Messages
35,848
Members
2,233
Latest member
Zahir
Back
Top