Analysis How New Made-in-India Hawk-I-2700 GaN AESA Radar Promises 350 km Detection Range for Su-30MKI Jets

How New Made-in-India Hawk-I-2700 GaN AESA Radar Promises 350 km Detection Range for Su-30MKI Jets


Recently showcased at the Aero India 2025 exhibition, the Hawk-I-2700 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar marks a major milestone for India's private defence industry.

Developed by the Chennai-based electronics firm Data Patterns, this advanced multifunction fire-control system is emerging as a powerful candidate for the Indian Air Force's (IAF) upcoming "Super Sukhoi" upgrade.

The new system aims to replace the older Russian-built N011M Bars radars currently equipped on the Su-30MKI fleet, bringing modern, cutting-edge capabilities to the frontline fighters.

At the core of the Hawk-I-2700 is its impressive array of 2,400 to 2,700 Gallium Nitride (GaN) Transmit/Receive Modules (TRMs).

Utilising GaN technology ensures better thermal management, higher power efficiency, and enhanced durability over older legacy radar systems.

Operating within the 8 to 12 GHz X-band frequency range, the radar boasts a peak power output of 25.28 kilowatts.

This immense power translates to exceptional detection capabilities: it can spot a large target with a 5-square-metre radar cross-section from 350 kilometres away, track a 2-square-metre target at 250 kilometres, and lock onto smaller 1-square-metre targets at a distance of 200 kilometres.

Built entirely in-house to strict military durability standards (MIL-STD-810), the system utilises a flat-panel architecture integrated with commercial-off-the-shelf processing units and high-speed digital receivers.

Notably, it incorporates an innovative Swash Controller Unit, which allows the antenna panel to tilt mechanically.

This mechanical movement, combined with electronic beam steering, expands the system's field of view significantly, providing pilots with superior situational awareness while operating in complex, electronically contested environments.

The radar delivers exceptional scanning flexibility, offering up to ±100 degrees of electronic coverage and ±70 degrees of mechanical movement in both horizontal (azimuth) and vertical (elevation) directions.

This wide field of view allows the Hawk-I-2700 to seamlessly search the airspace and track multiple targets at the same time with pinpoint accuracy.

Consequently, it drastically improves a fighter jet's capability to conduct beyond-visual-range missile engagements, execute precision ground attacks, and maintain a dominant view of the battlefield.

With the massive Su-30MKI upgrade programme on the horizon, the Hawk-I-2700 stands in direct competition with the state-owned Defence Research and Development Organisation's (DRDO) own Virupaksha radar, which also features roughly 2,400 modules and was prominently displayed at Aero India 2025.

However, Data Patterns points out that their offering is a completely independent, homegrown design aligned with the national "Atmanirbhar Bharat" initiative, rather than a modified version of existing technology.

Based on its impressive specifications, it ranks among the most sophisticated airborne combat radars ever produced by an Indian private company.

The creation of such a complex sensor highlights how rapidly India's private defence sector is maturing.

Alongside the radar, the company is actively developing additional hardware for the Su-30MKI, such as the Talon Shield electronic warfare jamming pod, designed to counter enemy emissions.

If selected and successfully integrated, the Hawk-I-2700 will not only keep the IAF's Su-30MKI fleet relevant for decades to come, but could also generate lucrative export potential for allied nations currently flying similar aircraft.
 
Looks impressive on paper. IAF should give it a closer look. Even if it does not make the MKI upgrade, it could spawn other Radars for other platforms
 
Please data patterns, make a tejas mk1a because obviously it's never going to come if we leave it to HAL
 
50-50 Mixed Upgrade will be better if both are capable 100 Sukhoi-30 MKI with Hawk i 2700 and 100 Sukhoi-30 MKI with Virupaksha Radar. Both radar might provide different Scaning & EW Warfare and can diversify IAF capabilities because they might not execute backend task in same way despite being GaN based AESA Radar.
 
Last edited:
50-50 Mixed Upgrade will be better if both are capable 100 Sukhoi-30 MKI with Hawk i 2700 and 100 Sukhoi-30 MKI with Virupaksha Radar. Both radar might provide different Scaning & EW Warfare and can diversify IAF capabilities because they might not execute backend task in same way despite being GaN based AESA Radar.
Bad idea. It would be more costly ( economics of scale), be a logistical nightmare and make it more difficult for fleet managent both from engineering and operational point of view. IAF should test both and choose the one that best suits its employment philosophy.
 
100 Radar from each vendor is optimal to reach Cost Effectiveness, ordering 500 Radars from same vendor will not make them free (Economics of Scale).

No Logistical Issue will be there infact It will offload the burden & time constrain of upgrading 200 Sukhoi-30MKI fighters from single vendor, 2 vendors will result in faster Super-Sukhoi rollouts by doubling the number of upgrade aircrafts at given point of time.

We tackle far bigger logistical issues than this in others jets which doesn't have parts avalable now, Data Patterns / HAL / DRDO will always available for their own National Aircrafts. Where we have logistical issues they are from foreign vendors not domestic.
 
Last edited:
100 Radar from each vendor is optimal to reach Cost Effectiveness, ordering 500 Radars from same vendor will not make them free.

No Logistical Issue will be there infact It will offload the burden of upgrading 200 Sukhoi-30MKI fighters from single vendor, 2 vendors will result in faster Super-Sukhoi rollouts by doubling the number of upgrade aircrafts.

We tackle far bigger logistical issues than this in others jets which doesn't have parts avalable now, Data Patterns / HAL / DRDO will always available for their own National Aircrafts. Where we have logistical issues they are from foreign vendors not domestic.
Lets take your points one by one.

First 100 Radars from each makes it 200 Radars. Where are the airframes for those radars going to come from?? If an airframe has 10 years or less life in it then the upgrade would not be cost effective. More intelligent people in IAF have already decided on upgrading 84 air frames.

Where do you think the upgrades will happen?? Unless you suggest parking a Sukhoi at some crossing on Chennai streets (Bengaluru, if you dont like Chennai) and upgrade it, they can only happen at HAL Nashik. So it wont matter. Each upgrade will have to be individually tested both on ground and in the air. That requires infrastructure and more importantly test pilots, who are not very numerous.

If you think, there are logistics issues only with foreign vendors and none with domestic vendors, you are living in a fool's paradise. Logistic issues are equally prevalent for both.
 
Around 200 Aircrafts will get Super Sukhoi upgrades. Sukhoi-30 will be in service till 2050 so airframes are perfectly fine, they takeoff with Brahmos. Su-30's have aging Avionics not aging Airframes. Only older 80 Aircrafts will not be upgraded & reassigned as Bomb Carriers.

If Data Patterns wins the bid even then HAL will be upgrading the aircrafts with help of data patterns. Yes testing will be seperate but it can be done in parallel.

No single vendor will provide your 200 Radars immediately, so diversifying sources are better, helps in better Supply Management. Having 2 Different Radar has its own trade-off in integration time and testing but in return can provide different capabilities & slightly faster rollouts with better supply without getting choked by production limit of single Vendor.
 
Last edited:
Around 200 Aircrafts will get Super Sukhoi upgrades. Sukhoi-30 will be in service till 2050 so airframes are perfectly fine, they takeoff with Brahmos. Su-30's have aging Avionics not aging Airframes. Only older 80 Aircrafts will not be upgraded & reassigned as Bomb Carriers.

If Data Patterns wins the bid even then HAL will be upgrading the aircrafts with help of data patterns. Yes testing will be seperate but it can be done in parallel.

No single vendor will provide your 200 Radars immediately, so diversifying sources are better, helps in better Supply Management. Having 2 Different Radar has its own trade-off in integration time and testing but in return can provide different capabilities & slightly faster rollouts with better supply without getting choked by production limit of single Vendor.
Fortunately or unfortunately you are not the CAS. He has decided that 84 ac are going to be upgraded. Incidentally the caninet comittee on security, headed by the PM has already agreed woth him. So do save your effort about selling 200 Radars to the IAF. Not this time but you try next time.

Second part. No company in the world has 200 radars sitting on its shelf waiting for a customer to walk in. That is not how defence eqpt is sold. For the sale to happen, a contract must be signed and first tranch of payment made. Company then mobilises the resources to build the radars. For a contract IAF first needs to evaluate the radar and decide that it meets their requirement. Having two different radars in the same fleet will destroy system commonality. Seperate training and setup for maintenance crew and more importantly different set of training for pilots. Operating such a high performance radar is a little different from say riding a bullet motor cycle one day and changing to a yamaha the next day. Repurcussions for a mistake is not just engine stalling but loss of an ac worth millions and may also be loss of aircrew who are priceless.
 
Fortunately or unfortunately you are not the CAS.
Dude, you are Yapper don't understand anything i said. it will not be first time that same aircraft will have diffrent radars, russian su30 and su35 had diffrent radars and avionics packages. Tejas Mk1 and Tejas Mk1A are to have different Radars.

I just gave my Opinon on it there is process which is better known by airforce and government. Alot of things has to be maintained just to survive and win the War not for Economics and Convinience.

War is won on the basis of Capabilities if having diverse capability requires more Management and Training Efforts then airforce will do it.

It will be foolish to think about Economical and logistical convenience at the cost of Defence of Country in War. Cost to Benefit Ratio doesn't get decided just on the basis of spending but also on the basis what kind of Advantage it can give us in War.

About Fleet Commonality, F35 Varients just share only around 25% of Parts Commonality so all the codes and integration has to be done separately for each varient.

At last bro i understand your concerns too but IAF can handle anything so Relax it doesn't have to look perfect, IAF is not Hotel Management. For Nation like India Diverse weapons will always be solution (Unpredictable for Enemy to Strategise).

Your are also Right I am also Right. GoodLuck
 
Last edited:
Dude, you are Yapper don't understand anything i said. it will not be first time that same aircraft will have diffrent radars, russian su30 and su35 had diffrent radars and avionics packages. Tejas Mk1 and Tejas Mk1A are to have different Radars.

I just gave my Opinon on it there is process which is better known by airforce and government. Alot of things has to be maintained just to survive and win the War not for Economics and Convinience.

War is won on the basis of Capabilities if having diverse capability requires more Management and Training Efforts then airforce will do it.

It will be foolish to think about Economical and logistical convenience at the cost of Defence of Country in War. Cost to Benefit Ratio doesn't get decided just on the basis of spending but also on the basis what kind of Advantage it can give us in War.

About Fleet Commonality, F35 Varients just share only around 25% of Parts Commonality so all the codes and integration has to be done separately for each varient.

At last bro i understand your concerns too but IAF can handle anything so Relax it doesn't have to look perfect, IAF is not Hotel Management. For Nation like India Diverse weapons will always be solution (Unpredictable for Enemy to Strategise).

Your are also Right I am also Right. GoodLuck
You are so ignorant that you dont even know Su-30 and Su-35 are completely different ac. Their development timelines are also different. Do you even have a clue as to how much different Mk1 and Mk1A are?? If you dont, ask a serious aerospace engineer. Further we can do mods to the Tejas at will because we own the design. We dont own the MKI design.

You wax eloquent on warfighting without having a clue what warfighting is all about. I have about 35 years of experience in that business. Please do share your level of experience.

Regarding the F-35. The only thing common is the name. Otherwise they were designed from the ground up to be completely different for different roles. The 25% commonality that you quote comes from certain components that can be used in all the types. It is exactly like the OBOGS that was developed for the Mk1 is also going into the Mk2. That does not make them the same.

Lastly, you said IAF can handle anything and that warfighting is not like hotel management. I agree because I know more about war fighting than you will ever learn in your life time.

Read this and then decide who is the yapper.
 
I understand that what you are saying, i didn't knew about your experience, just misunderstood for someone criticizes everything & you are not Yapper.
I have about 35 years of experience in that business. Please do share your level of experience.
I am just curious what is your Professional Background.
 
I understand that what you are saying, i didn't knew about your experience, just misunderstood for someone criticizes everything & you are not Yapper.

I am just curious what is your Professional Background.
I told you war fighting. With a fast jet fighter strapped onto my backside.🫡
 

Forum statistics

Threads
7,737
Messages
67,599
Members
5,633
Latest member
@MsVikash
Back
Top